Abstract
The treatment of massive rotator cuff tears remains controversial. There is lack of studies comparing patient-reported outcomes (PROM) of arthroscopic massive rotator cuff repairs (RCR) against large, medium and small RCRs. Our study aims to report the PROM for arthroscopic massive RCR versus non-massive RCR.
Patients undergoing an arthroscopic RCR under a single surgeon over a 5-year period were included. Demographic data were recorded. Pre-operative Quick-DASH and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) were prospectively collected pre-operatively and at final review (mean of 18 months post-operatively). The scores were compared to a matched cohort of patients who had large, medium or small RCRs. A post-hoc power analysis confirmed 98% power was achieved.
82 patients were included in the study. 42 (51%) patients underwent massive RCR. The mean age of patients undergoing massive RCR was 59.7 and 55% (n=23) were female. 21% of massive RCRs had biceps augmentation. Quick-DASH improved significantly from a mean of 46.1 pre-operatively to 15.6 at final follow-up for massive RCRs (p<0.001). OSS improved significantly from a mean of 26.9 pre-operatively to 41.4 at final follow up for massive RCRs (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the final Quick-DASH and OSS scores for massive and non-massive RCRs (p=0.35 and p=0.45 respectively). No revision surgery was required within the minimum one year follow up timescale.
Arthroscopic massive rotator cuff repairs have no functional difference to non-massive rotator cuff repairs in the short term follow up period and should be considered in appropriate patient groups.
