header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

MIXED IMPLANT DEBRIS CAUSES A STRONG MACROPHAGE RESPONSE IN ANATOMIC AND REVERSE TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTIES

International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA) meeting, 32nd Annual Congress, Toronto, Canada, October 2019. Part 2 of 2.



Abstract

Introduction

The combined incidence of anatomic (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasties (rTSA) in the US is 90,000 per annum and rising. There has been little attention given to potential long-term complications due to periprosthetic tissue reactions to implant debris. The shoulder has been felt to be relatively immune to these complications due to lower acting loads compared to other joint arthroplasties. In this study, retrieved aTSAs and rTSAs were examined to determine the extent of implant damage and to characterize the nature of the corresponding periprosthetic tissue responses.

Methods

TSA components and periprosthetic tissues were retrieved from 23 (eleven aTSA, twelve rTSA). Damage to the implants was characterized using light microscopy. Head/stem taper junction damage was graded 1–4 as minimal, mild, moderate or marked. Damage on polyethylene (PE) and metal bearing surfaces was graded 1–3 (mild, moderate, marked). H&E stained sections of periprosthetic soft tissues were evaluated for the extent and type of cellular response. A semi-quantitative system was used to score (1=rare to 4=marked) the overall number of particle-laden macrophages, foreign body giant cells, lymphocytes, plasma cells, eosinophils, and neutrophils. Implant damage and histopathological patterns were compared between the two TSA groups using the Mann-Whitney and Spearman tests.

Results

The PE bearing surfaces of aTSAs were dominated by three-body wear and plastic deformation, whereas the rTSA PE components exhibited mainly polishing and scratching. Metal surface damage occurred in a few cases of both groups. Only one aTSA case exhibited marked taper corrosion. In both groups the primary nature of the inflammatory response was a moderate to marked macrophage response to wear particles (78% of cases). The particle-laden macrophages tended to occur in broad sheets and contained metal, PE, bone cement and suture debris. The extent of macrophage and foreign body giant cell responses was greater in the aTSA group (p≤0.001). Metal particles were seen in 63% of aTSAs and 83% of rTSAs. In the aTSA group, bone cement was seen in all cases and suture was observed in 9 cases, and their presence was larger compared to the rTSA group (p≤0.022). There was no difference in the number of other cell types between the groups. A mild lymphocyte response and chromium-phosphate debris was present within the tissue of the aTSA case with marked corrosion, which may be indicative of an early stage adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR) analog to total hip replacements with taper corrosion.

Conclusion

Both groups exhibited a strong macrophage response to a combination of different types of implant debris—PE, metal, bone cement and suture. The prevalence of a marked macrophage response was larger in the aTSA group which may be explained by the larger overall presence of cement and suture within this group. PE particles may differ in size between groups due to different acting wear mechanisms which may also affect the extent of the macrophage response. Although corrosion within modular junctions was overall rare, the presence of one case with marked corrosion shows that taper corrosion and subsequent ALTRs are possible in TSAs.

For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly.