PUTTING GAMMA BACK IN GRANDMA: INFORMING CLINICAL BEARING SELECTION AND TRADE OFFS THROUGH CHEMICAL AND MECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF OVER 500 CONTEMPORARY ANTIOXIDANT AND HIGHLY CROSS-LINKED RETRIEVALS

Introduction

In vivo, UHMWPE bearing surfaces are subject to wear and oxidation that can lead to bearing fatigue or fracture. A prior study in our laboratory of early antioxidant (AO) polyethylene retrievals, compared to gamma-sterilized and highly cross-linked (HXL) retrievals, showed them to be more effective at preventing in vivo oxidation. The current analysis expands that early study, addressing the effect of:

1. manufacturing-variables on as-manufactured UHMWPE;

2. in vivo time on these initial properties;

3. identifying important factors in selecting UHMWPE for the hip or knee.

Methods

After our prior report, our IRB-approved retrieval laboratory received an additional 96 consecutive AO-retrievals (19 hips, 77 knees: in vivo time 0–6.7 years) of three currently-marketed AO-polyethylenes. These retrievals represented two different antioxidants (Vitamin E and Covernox) and two different delivery methods: blending-prior-to and diffusing-after irradiation cross-linking. Consecutive HXL acetabular and tibial inserts, received at retrieval, with in vivo time of 0–6.7 years (260 remelted, 170 annealed) were used for comparison with AO-retrievals.

All retrievals were analyzed for oxidation and trans-vinylene index (TVI) using a Thermo-Scientific iN10 FTIR microscope. Mechanical properties were evaluated for 35 tibial inserts by uniaxial tensile testing using an INSTRON load frame. Cross-link density (n=289) was measured using a previously published gravimetric gel swell technique. Oxidation was reported as maximum ketone oxidation index (KOI) measured for each bearing. TVI was reported as the average of all scans for each material. Cross-link density and mechanical properties were evaluated as a function of both TVI and oxidation.

Results

Minimal increase in oxidation was seen in these AO-retrievals, out to almost 7 years in vivo. In contrast, HXL-retrievals showed increasing KOI with time in vivo (annealed-HXL = 0.127/year, remelted-HXL = 0.036/year, p<0.001). HXL oxidation rate was higher in knees (0.091/year) than in hips (0.048/year), p<0.001. Cross-link density (XLD) correlated positively with TVI for both HXL (Pearson's correlation=0.591, p<0.001) and AO (Pearson's correlation=0.598, p<0.001) retrievals. AO-materials had higher TVI for the same or similar XLD than did HXL polyethylene. XLD correlated negatively with KOI for HXL retrievals (Pearson's correlation=−0.447, p<0.001). Mechanical properties varied by material across all materials evaluated, with tensile toughness correlating negatively with increasing TVI (Pearson Correlation=−0.795, p<0.001).

Discussion

Irradiation cross-linking has been used effectively to improve wear resistance. Residual free radicals from irradiation are the target of AO-polyethylene, to prevent loss of UHMWPE XLD, resulting from in vivo oxidation of free radicals as seen in HXL retrievals, and toughness, resulting from oxidation or initial remelting. Despite different manufacturing variables, AO-polyethylene retrievals in this cohort had minimal oxidation and no change in XLD or toughness due to oxidation.

However, toughness did vary with irradiation dose as did cross-link density. To achieve the same level of cross-linking as HXL-polyethylene required a higher irradiation dose in blended AO-polyethylene. AO-polyethylenes evaluated in this study had toughness that decreased with irradiation dose, but avoided loss of toughness due to remelting. Because AO-polyethylenes did not oxidize, they did not show the decrease of cross-link density, and potential loss of wear resistance, seen in HXL-polyethylene.

For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly.