Abstract
Introduction
Acetabular dysplasia, also known as developmental dysplasia of the hip, has been shown to contribute to the onset of osteoarthritis. Surgical correction involves repositioning the acetabulum in order to improve coverage of the femoral head. However, ideal placement of the acetabular fragment can often be difficult due to inadequate visualization. Therefore, there has been an increased need for pre-operative planning and navigation modalities for this procedure.
Methods
PubMed and EBSCO Host databases were queried using keywords (preoperative, pre-op, preop, before surgery, planning, plan, operation, surgery, surgical, acetabular dysplasia, developmental dysplasia of the hip, and Hip Dislocation, Congenital [Mesh]) from 1974 to March 2019. The search generated 411 results. We included all case-series, English, full-text manuscripts pertaining to pre-operative planning for congenital acetabular dysplasia. Exclusion criteria included: total hip arthroplasty (THA) planning, patient population mean age over 35, and double and single case studies.
Results
A total of 12 manuscripts met our criteria for a total of 186 hips. Preoperative planning modalities described were: Amira (Thermo Fischer Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA) − 12.9%, OrthoMap (Stryker Orthopaedics; Mahwah, NJ, USA) − 36.5%, Amira + Biomechanical Guidance System (Johns Hopkins University) − 5.9%, Mills et al. method − 16.1%, Klaue et al. method − 16.1%, Armand et al. method − 6.5%, Tsumura et al. method − 3.8%, and Morrita et al. method − 2.2%. Virtual implementation of the Amira software yielded increases in femoral head coverage (p<0.05) and a significant decrease in lateral center edge angle (LCEA) (p<0.05). A significant decrease in post-surgical complications (0.0% navigated group vs. 8.7% non-navigated group, p<0.01) was found with usage of OrthoMap related planning.
Conclusion
There was a notable lack of prospective studies demonstrating the efficacy of these modalities, with decreased post-surgical complications being the only added benefit of their use. Additionally, small sample sizes and lack of commercial availability for many of these programs further diminishes their applicability. Future studies are needed to compare computer assisted planning with traditional radiographic assessment of ideal osteotomy orientation. Furthermore, these programs must be readily accessible rather than be solely available to the researchers who wrote the program.
For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly.
