header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Hip

COMPARISON OF HOSPITAL ADVERSE EVENTS AND 90-DAY PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES BETWEEN DIRECT ANTERIOR SIMULTANEOUS BILATERAL VERSUS UNILATERAL AND STAGED BILATERAL TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY

The Hip Society (THS) 2020 Members Meeting, held online, 1–2 October 2020.



Abstract

Background

Direct anterior approach (DAA), total hip arthroplasty (THA, performed with the patient in the supine position, creates a unique opportunity to do bilateral THA under one anesthesia. Previous studies evaluating this option are limited by small sample size or lack of control group. The purpose of this study is to compare early clinical outcomes of simultaneous bilateral, unilateral and staged bilateral DAA-THA.

Methods

Using an institutional registry database, we reviewed 3977 DAA-THA performed in 3334 patients at minimum 90-days follow up. A single surgeon performed all surgeries. Simultaneous bilateral DAA-THA group included 512 hips in 256 patients, unilateral DAA-THA group 2691 hips and staged bilateral DAA-THA group 774 hips in 387 patients. We reviewed 90-day postoperative complications, readmissions, length of stay, and rate of home discharge between all three groups.

Results

There were no statistical differences in readmission (range 0.77–1.8%), postoperative clinical complications, and rate of home discharge (96.1–98.1%) between simultaneous bilateral, unilateral, or staged bilateral groups. The number of transfusions in the simultaneous bilateral group (9/256, 3.5%) was significantly higher than in the unilateral (24/2691, 0.89%, p=0.002) or the staged bilateral group (4/387, 1.0%, p=0.04). The total length of stay (LOS) in the simultaneous bilateral group (1.8 ± 0.8 days) was longer (p<0.001) than in the unilateral group (1.2 ± 1.0 days) but shorter (p<0.001) than the two added LOS in the staged bilateral group (2.8 ± 2.2 days).

Conclusion

Our large cohort in a single surgeon case showed that simultaneous bilateral DAA-THA is comparable with unilateral or staged bilateral surgery in regards to postoperative clinical complications, readmission rate, and rate of home discharge but with an increased rate of transfusion. We believe that simultaneous bilateral DAA-THA is a reasonable and safe option in properly selected patients who require bilateral THA.