Abstract
Introduction
Ligament reconstruction following knee soft tissue injuries, such as posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tears, aim to restore normal joint function and motion; however, persistant pathomechanical joint behavior indicates that there is room for improvement in current reconstruction techniques. Increased attention is being directed towards the roles of secondary knee stabilizers, in an attempt to better understand their contributions to kinematics of knees. The objective of this study is to characterize the relative biomechanical contributions of the posterior oblique ligament (POL) and the deep medial collateral ligament (dMCL) in PCL-deficient knees. We hypothesized that, compared with the POL, the dMCL would have a more substantial role in stabilizing the medial side of the knee, especially in flexion (slack POL).
Methods
Seven fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were used in this study (age 40–62, 4 female, 3). Specimens were potted and mounted onto a VIVO joint motion simulator (AMTI). Once installed, specimens were flexed from 0 to 90 degrees with a 10 N axial load and all remaining degrees of freedom unconstrained. This was repeated with (a) a 67 N posterior load, (b) a 2.5 Nm internal or external rotational moment and (c) a 50 N posterior load and 2.5 Nm internal rotational moment applied to the tibia. During each resulting knee motion, the relative AP kinematics of the dMCL tibial insertion (approximated as the most medial point of the proximal tibia) with respect to the flexion axis of the femur (the geometric center axis, based on the posterior femoral condyles) were calculated at 0, 30, 60 and 90 degrees of flexion. These motions were repeated following dissection of the PCL and then further dissection of either medial ligament (4 POL, 3 dMCL). The changes in AP kinematics due to ligament dissection were analyzed using three-way repeated-measures ANOVA with a significance value of 0.05.
Results
Dissection of the dMCL or POL did not result in a statistically significant increase in the posterior displacement of the medial tibial point under posterior directed force, internal rotation moments, or the combined posterior force plus internal rotation moment. Interestingly, under external moment loading, there was a statistically significant increase in anterior displacement of the medial tibia at all flexion angles after POL dissection, by up to 3.0+/−2.6 mm at 0 degrees. Dissection of the dMCL, however, did not have a significant affect.
Conclusion
Our results showed that neither the POL nor dMCL play a significant role in resisting posterior tibial displacements on the medial side of a PCL deficient knee. Of the two, the POL appears to have a greater contribution towards preventing anterior translations, particularly when in extension. This finding is rational based on the anatomical path of this ligament wrapping around the femoral medial condyle under external rotational moments. In contrast with our hypothesis, it was observed that the dMCL had less of an effect on medial knee stability. Contributions of these ligaments could be further investigated using more complicated loading, such as those more representative of activities of daily living.
