Abstract
Introduction
Femoral neck impingement occurs clinically in total hip replacements (THR) when the acetabular liner articulates against the neck of a femoral stem prosthesis. This may occur in vivo due to factors such as prostheses design, patient anatomical variation, and/or surgical malpositioning, and may be linked to joint instability, unexplained pain, and dislocation. The Standard Test Method for Impingement of Acetabular Prostheses, ASTM F2582 −14, may be used to evaluate acetabular component fatigue and deformation under repeated impingement conditions. It is worth noting that while femoral neck impingement is a clinical observation, relative motions and loading conditions used in ASTM F2582-14 do not replicate in vivo mechanisms. As written, ASTM F2582-14 covers failure mechanism assessment for acetabular liners of multiple designs, materials, and sizes. This study investigates differences observed in the implied and executed kinematics described in ASTM F2582-14 using a Prosim electromechanical hip simulator (Simulation Solutions, Stockport, Greater Manchester) and an AMTI hydraulic 12-station hip simulator (AMTI, Watertown, MA).
Method
Neck impingement testing per ASTM F2582-14 was carried out on four groups of artificially aged acetabular liners (per ASTM F2003-15) made from GUR 1020 UHMWPE which was re-melted and cross-linked at 7.5 Mrad. Group A (n=3) and B (n=3) consisted of 28mm diameter femoral heads articulating on 28mm ID × 44mm OD acetabular liners. Group C (n=3) and D (n=3) consisted of 40mm diameter femoral heads articulating on lipped 40mm ID × 56mm OD 10° face changing acetabular liners. All acetabular liners were tested in production equivalent shell-fixtures mounted at 0° initial inclination angle. Femoral stems were potted in resin to fit respective simulator test fixtures. Testing was conducted in bovine serum diluted to 18mg/mL protein content supplemented with sodium azide and EDTA. Groups A and C were tested on a Prosim; Groups B and D were tested on an AMTI. Physical examination and coordination measurement machine (CMM) analyses were conducted on all liners pre-test and at 0.2 million cycle intervals to monitor possible failure mechanisms. Testing was conducted for 1.0 million cycles or until failure.
An Abaqus/Explicit model was created to investigate relative motions and contact areas resulting from initial impingement kinematics for each test group.
Results
Effects of kinematic differences in the execution of ASTM F2582-14 were observed in the four groups based on simulator type (Figure 1) and liner design. The Abaqus/Explicit FEA model revealed notable differences in relative motions and contact points (Figure 2) between specimen components i.e. acetabular liner, femoral head, and femoral stem throughout range of motion.
Acetabular liner angular change within shell-fixtures, rim deformation, crack propagation, and metal-on-metal contact between acetabular shell-fixtures and femoral stems were observed as potential failure mechanisms (Figure 3) throughout testing. These mechanisms varied in severity by group due to differing contact stresses and simulator constraints.
Significance
Investigating failure mechanisms caused by altered kinematics of in-vitro neck impingement testing, due to influences of simulator type and acetabular liner design, may aid understanding of failure mechanisms involved when assessing complaints/retrievals and influence future prosthetic designs.
For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.
