Abstract
Introduction
This research determines the feasibility of radiostereometric analysis (RSA) as a diagnostic tool for assessing fusion following spinal arthrodesis. Further, to estimate clinical thresholds for precision and accuracy of the proposed method in the cervical and lumbar spine.
Methods
Two-level lumbo-sacral and three-level cervical posterior arthrodesis procedures were performed on an artificial spine model and a cadaveric spine (Figure 1). Using a spring-loaded inserter, RSA marker beads were placed within each of the L4-S1 and C3-C6 vertebrae, then analyzed for optimal bead distribution and detection.
RSA imaging consisted of 12 double exams (24 exams) of the cervical and lumbar regions for both the Sawbones and cadaveric spine to assess precision of measurement under zero-displacement conditions, defined as the 95% confidence interval of error. Accuracy assessment was performed on the Sawbones model in which the middle vertebrae (L5 and C4-C5) were moved relative to the superior (L4 and C3) and inferior (S1 and C6) vertebrae by known, incremental displacements (Figure 2). RSA images were obtained at each displacement (Figure 3). Accuracy was defined as the mean difference between known and measured displacements.
Results
Median RSA bead detection was 100% in cervical vertebrae and >75% in lumbar vertebrae in the artificial and cadaveric models. Translational RSA precision for both spine models was better than 0.25mm and 0.82mm for the lumbar and cervical regions, respectively. Rotational precision was better than 0.4° and 1.9° for the lumbar and cervical regions, respectively. RSA accuracy for the artificial spine overall demonstrated less than 0.11 mm translational bias (margin < ±0.02 mm) and less than 0.22° rotational bias (margin < ±0.15°).
Discussion and Conclusion
This study demonstrates that RSA achieves sufficient precision and accuracy to detect intervertebral micromotion for the purpose of assessing arthrodesis. Well dispersed bead placement is critical to achieving sufficient accuracy and avoiding occlusion by metal hardware. The results of this work will aid in the development of a clinical study to assess arthrodesis in patients.
For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.
