header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Spine

OSTEOPATHS' PERCEPTIONS, BELIEFS AND PRACTICE OF PROMOTING ACTIVITY IN THE TREATMENT OF NON-SPECIFIC LOW BACK PAIN: A QUALITATIVE STUDY

The Society for Back Pain Research (SBPR) 2018 Meeting, Groningen, The Netherlands, 15–16 November 2018.



Abstract

Background

There is an increasing burden of LBP. Clinical guidelines promote physical activity (PA) and self-management strategies and aim to reform unhelpful clinical activity. This study explores osteopaths' beliefs about non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) and the role of activity in the treatment of NSLBP.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of twelve qualified osteopaths in the UK. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and constructivist grounded theory was used to conceptualise, collect and analyse data.

Results

Four categories; practitioners' beliefs and mode of practice, PA interventions used, challenges and obstacles to promoting activity and strategies used in practice; conceptualised three practitioner styles. Variation was reported in the management of NSLBP, perceptions of successful PA interventions and strategies used in practice. Perceived obstacles to PA were identified. A proposed model highlights how different practitioner styles adopted a biomedical or behavioural orientation towards NSLBP, leading to different approaches to behavioural change strategies and self-management in the treatment of NSLBP.

Conclusion

There are opportunities for educational programs to enhance competencies in exercise prescription and activity promotion, and knowledge of behavioural change strategies to promote self-management in NSLBP. Further quantitative research is recommended to measure osteopaths' attitudes and behaviour related to activity promotion and to test clinical effectiveness of related interventions.

No conflicts of interest

No funding obtained


Email: