header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPARISONS BETWEEN ACROMEGALIC AND NON-ACROMEGALIC PATIENTS WITH DIRECT ANTERIOR APPROACH TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY

International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA) 31st Annual Congress, London, England, October 2018. Part 2.



Abstract

Background

Acromegaly, which stems from high level of serum growth hormone secreted by a benign tumour in the anterior pituitary gland, is likely to cause severe peripheral joint pains due to hypertrophic changes in such joints. Recently, the life expectancy of such patients has been improved and more patients with acromegaly have undergone joint surgeries to mitigate joint pain and malfunctions. However, little is known about to what extent surgical procedures can improve the joint functions of acromegalic patients compared to non-acromegalic cases.

Methods

First, we qualitatively analysed prognosis of total hip arthroplasty (THA) of acromegalic patients by investigating 11 cases in which direct anterior approach (DAA) THAs were performed to 8 acromegalic patients in our hospital between 2012 and 2015.

Second, we quantitatively compared the functional prognosis of the 11 cases with that of 107 non-acromegalic cases. Technically, to control the difference in age, sex, height, and weight between the two patient groups, we first identified a model that could predict 3month-/6month-/12month-functional prognosis in the control cases. We estimated differences in functional outcomes between the two groups by calculating how accurately the control-case-based model could predict the prognosis of the acromegalic cases.

Results

In the qualitative analysis, we found that compared to the control, the most acromegalic cases had atypically advanced degenerative arthritides with osteophytes and enthesophytes proliferations. In addition, some cases showed other signs, such as flattering of femoral head and arthritis with slight osteophytes. Regarding surgical procedures, acromegalic cases were likely to require longer operation time and larger amounts of blood loss compared to the control.

In the quantitative analysis, we first identified a model in which age and body height could predict the functional prognosis of DAA THA in the non-acromegalic cases (F[2,104] = 6.7, P = 0.0017). We then found that the actual functional outcomes of the acromegalic cases were not significantly different from those predicted by this control-case-based model (P = 0.18).

Conclusions

The qualitative analysis shows the atypical joint structures and resultant prolonged operation time and blood loss in the acromegalic cases. However, the quantitative analysis could not find significant differences in prognosis between the acromegalic and non-acromegalic cases. Although these observations and analyses need to be examined in studies with large sample sizes, this work suggests that functional outcomes of DAA THA to acromegalic patients can be comparable to that to non-acromegalic patients.