Abstract
Objective
We explanted NeuFlex metacarpophalangeal (MP) joint prostheses to identify common features, such as position of fracture, and thus better understand the reasons for implant failure.
Methods
Explanted NeuFlex MP joint prostheses were retrieved as part of an-ongoing implant retrieval programme. Following revision MP joint surgery the implants were cleaned and sent for assessment. Ethical advice was sought but not required. The explants were photographed. The position of fracture, if any, was noted. Patient demographics were recorded.
Results
Thirty NeuFlex MP explants were available. Seven (23%) were not fractured. Eleven explants (37%) had fractured at the hinge; nine (30%) had fractured at the junction of the distal stem and hinge; and three (10%) had fractured at both the hinge and distal stem. NeuFlex MP joint explants ranged in size from 0 to 40. Smaller sizes were retrieved from smaller fingers; larger implants came from the middle and index fingers. The age at revision ranged from 43 to 81 (median 58) years. Time in vivo ranged from 6 to 120 (median 58.5) months. All but two implants were obtained from rheumatoid joints, the remainder had osteoarthritis. Discolouration of some explants had occurred; other explants appeared to show no colour change.
Conclusions
This is the first report of the position of fracture of NeuFlex explants. It is also the largest report of silicone arthroplasty explants. The majority (77%) had fractured. Nine (30%) NeuFlex explants had fractured at the junction of the distal stem and hinge; the typical position seen with Swanson and Sutter/Avanta MP joint explants. Eleven (37%) fractured across the hinge; this has not previously been reported although has been seen in in vitro testing. The hinge is thinner than the hinge-stem junction so may be at risk of more rapid failure, however the median time in vivo for hinge fractures was 63 months as opposed to 54 months for fractures at the distal stem. Intriguingly, 3 (10%) NeuFlex explants suffered fractures both at the hinge and at the junction of the distal stem and hinge which has also never been reported previously. Fracture at the junction of the distal stem and hinge shows the importance of subluxing forces in rheumatoid MP joints and therefore suggests these need to be mitigated as much as possible. Fracture across the hinge could indicate this as a position which could be increased in thickness, to increase the time taken to fracture, although there may be a concomitant increase in stiffness of the implant. With improved designs, patients might suffer fewer or later failures. The latest Norwegian Arthroplasty Registry report shows that revision MP joint arthroplasties accounted for 42% of all MP joint replacement operations in 2015. Therefore, this is an important area where opportunities exist to reduce revision rates.
