Abstract
Introduction
Trabecular Titanium is a biomaterial characterized by a regular three-dimensional hexagonal cell structure imitating trabecular bone morphology. Components are built via Electron Beam Melting technology in aone- step additive manufacturing process. This biomaterial combines the proven mechanical properties of Titanium with the elastic modulus provided by its cellular solid structure (Regis 2015 MRS Bulletin). Several in vitro studies reported promising outcomes on its osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties: Trabecular Titanium showed to significantly affect osteoblast attachment and proliferation while inhibiting osteoclastogenesis (Gastaldi 2010 J Biomed Mater Res A, Sollazzo 2011 ISRN Mater Sci); human adipose stem cells were able to adhere, proliferate and differentiate into an osteoblast-like phenotype in absence of osteogenic factors (Benazzo 2014 J Biomed Mater Res A). Furthermore, in vivo histological and histomorphometric analysis in a sheep model indicated that it provided bone in-growth in cancellous (+68%) and cortical bone (+87%) (Devine 2012 JBJS). A multicentre prospective study was performed to assess mid-term outcomes of acetabular cups in Trabecular Titanium after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA).
Methods
89 patients (91 hips) underwent primary cementless THA. There were 46 (52%) men and 43 (48%) women, with a median (IQR) age and BMI of 67 (57–70) years and 26 (24–29) kg/m2, respectively. Diagnosis was mostly primary osteoarthritis in 80 (88%) cases. Radiographic and clinical evaluations (Harris Hip Score [HHS], SF-36) were performed preoperatively and at 7 days, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 60 months. Bone Mineral Density (BMD) was determined by dual-emission X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) according to DeLee &Charnley 3 Regions of Interest (ROI) postoperatively at the same time-points using as baseline the measureat 1 week. Statistical analysis was carried out using Wilcoxon test.
Results
Median (IQR) HHS and SF-36 improved significantly from 48 (39–61) and 49 (37–62) preoperatively to 99 (96–100) and 76 (60–85) at 60 mo. (p≤0.0001). Radiographic analysis showed evident signs of bone remodelling and biological fixation, with presence of superolateral and inferomedial bone buttress, and radial trabeculae in ROI I/II. All cups resulted radiographically stable without any radiolucent lines. The macro-porous structure of this biomaterial generates a high coefficient of friction (Marin 2012 Hip Int), promoting a firm mechanical interlocking at the implant-bone interface which could be already observed in the operating room. BMD initially declined from baseline at 7 days to 6 months. Then, BMD slightly increased or stabilized in all ROIs up to 24 months, while showing evidence of partial decline over time with increasing patient' age at 60 months, although without any clinical significance in terms of patients health status or implant stability. Statistical significant correlations in terms of bone remodeling were observed between groups of patients on the basis of gender and age (p≤0.05). No revision or implant failure was reported.
Conclusions
All patients reported significant improvements in quality of life, pain relief and functional recovery. Radiographic evaluation confirmed good implant stability at 60 months. These outcomes corroborate the evidence reported on these cups by orthopaedic registries and literature (Perticarini 2015 BMC Musculoskelet Disord; Bistolfi 2014 Min Ortop).
