Abstract
Purpose
Various approaches have been reported for the total hip replacement (THR). In recent years, a muscle sparing approach with low postoperative muscle weakness and low dislocation risk has been frequently selected. However, such surgery has a learning curve. Thus, at the time of switching from the conventional approach to such approaches, invasion or infection risk may increase with the operation time extension. The purpose of this study is to clarify the change of invasiveness or latent infection rate with the change in approach in order to select the cases safely at the beginning of introducing a new approach in THR.
Methods
In facility A, THR was performed with Dall's approach (Dall), but 1 surgeon changed Dall to anterolateral modified Watson-Jones approach (OCM) and another surgeon changed Dall to direct anterior approach (DAA). In facility B, all 3 surgeons changed posterolateral (PL) approach to OCM. The subjects are 150 cases in total, including the each last 25 cases operated with the conventional approach and the each first 25 cases operated with a new approach (Dall to OCM: 25 + 25, Dall to DAA: 25 + 25, PL to OCM: 25 +25 cases). And, differences in operative time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative hemoglobin, white blood cell count, lymphocyte count, creatine kinase (CK), C-reactive protein (CRP) were investigated.
Results
The average age of subjects was 64 years (31–87 years old), and there were 27 male subjects and 123 female subjects. In the change from Dall to OCM, only the postoperative hospital stay decreased significantly. In the change from Dall to DAA, the length of hospital stay and postoperative CRP significantly decreased, but the intraoperative bleeding volume increased. In the change from PL to OCM, the operation time, postoperative CRP and CK decreased, but postoperative Hb decreased. Cases with lymphocytes less than 1000/µL or less than 10% after surgery on day 4 are latent infection cases, and in such cases the operation time was significantly longer, the postoperative Hb was significantly lower, and the postoperative CK was significantly higher. However, such cases were not significantly increased by the change of operation approach.
Conclusion
Introduction of the muscle sparing approach improved many items on surgical invasion, but some items deteriorated especially at the beginning of a new approach. In the early stages of introduction of the new approach, choosing cases without obesity and without lots of muscle volume may reduce latent infection.
