header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

ACCURATE ACETABULAR CUP PLACEMENT IN TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: COMPARISON OF AN OPTICAL NAVIGATION SYSTEM AND INERTIAL MEASUREMENT UNIT

International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA) 31st Annual Congress, London, England, October 2018. Part 1.



Abstract

Introduction

Component positioning is of great importance in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and navigation systems can help guide surgeons in the optimal placement of the implants. We report on a newly developed navigation system which employs an inertial measurement unit (IMU) to measure acetabular cup inclination and anteversion.

Aims

To assess the accuracy of the IMU when used for acetabular cup placement and compare this with an established optical navigation system (ONS).

Methods

At the time of acetabular cup impaction, the IMU and ONS were separately mounted on the impactor handle. Cup inclination and anteversion as measured by each device were recorded. Post-operative CTs were acquired for all patients and used to determine the final cup position.

Results

Data were recorded for a total of 100 patients undergoing THA; 51 had a direct anterior approach (DAA) and 49 had a posterior approach (PA).

In the DAA group, the mean difference in IMU versus CT measured cup inclination was −0.7°(range −6 to 8º) compared with mean difference of ONS versus CT of −2° (range −8 to 5º). Mean difference in IMU versus CT measured anteversion was − 1.3° (range −10 to 10º) compared with a mean difference of −1.1° (range −23 to 20º) between ONS and CT.

In the PA group, mean difference in IMU versus CT inclination was 1.3º (range −8 to 6º) compared with mean difference between ONS versus CT of 1.6° (range −5 to 7º). Mean difference in anteversion was 3.7° (range −7 to 16º) between IMU and CT and 7.3° (range −3 to 19º) between ONS and CT.

Conclusion

The novel IMU can be used to accurately determine the position of the acetabular cup at the point of impaction, demonstrating comparable accuracy with an established navigation system in the direct anterior approach, and even greater accuracy in the posterior approach.


Email: