header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

FRETTING INITIATED CREVICE CORROSION OF STAINLESS STEEL ON STAINLESS STEEL

International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA) 31st Annual Congress, London, England, October 2018. Part 1.



Abstract

Introduction

Fretting crevice-corrosion (tribocorrosion) of metallic biomaterials is a major concern in orthopedic, spinal, dental and cardiovascular devices1. Stainless steel (i.e., 316L SS) is one alloy that sees extensive use in applications where fretting, crevices and corrosion may be present. While fretting-corrosion of this alloy has been somewhat studied, the concept of fretting-initiating crevice corrosion (FICC), where an initial fretting corrosion process leads to ongoing crevice-corrosion without continued fretting, is less understood. This study investigated the susceptibility of 316L SS to FICC and the role of applied potential on the process. The hypothesis is crevice-corrosion can be induced in 316L SS at potentials well below the pitting potential.

Materials and Methods

A pin-on-disk fretting test system similar to that of Swaminathan et al.2 was employed. Disks were ∼35 mm in diameter and the pin area was ∼500 mm. Samples were polished to 600 mm finish, cleaned with ethanol and distilled water. An Ag/AgCl wire as the reference, a carbon counter electrode and phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4, Room T) were used for electrochemical testing. Load was controlled with a dead-weight system, monitored with a six-axis load cell (ATI Inc.).

Interfacial motion was captured with a non-contact eddy current sensor (0.5 mm accuracy). Motion and load data acquisition was performed with Labview (National Instruments).

Samples were loaded to ∼2 N. The potential per tests was increased from −250 to 250 mV (50 mV increments) with new locations and pins used in each repeat (n=3). Testing incorporated a 1 min rest before fretting (5 min, 1.25 Hz, 60 mm displacement saw tooth pattern). Fretting ceased and the load was held while currents were captured for another 5 min to assess ongoing crevice corrosion.

Results

Testing showed that crevice corrosion can be initiated within minutes of fretting (or in a few cycles depending on potential; Fig. 1). Potentials as low as −100 mV showed evidence of corrosion, while sustained crevice corrosion was seen at −50 mV. As the potential increased above −50 mV, susceptibility to FICC increased. Fig. 2 is a typical cyclic polarization curve for 316L SS in PBS without fretting. Pitting starts at 400 mV vs Ag/AgCl, and the protection potential in this case is around potentials where FICC can be induced.

Discussion

This study showed that 316L SS is prone to FICC starting at −100 mV and the severity of the crevice-corrosion damage depends on the applied potential (Fig. 3). Current after cessation of fretting takes longer to return to baseline or does not return indicating ongoing corrosion without fretting (Fig. 1). If the pin and disk are separated, the crevice-corrosion process stops immediately. The region immediately outside the fretting contact was crevice-like with a very small separation distance between the pin and disk surface which allowed crevice corrosion to develop (Fig. 3).

Conclusion

316L SS can undergo FICC at potentials close to normal physiological electrode potential conditions. Few fretting cycles are required to develop conditions for continued crevice-corrosion. Higher potentials increased the susceptibility of FICC in 316L SS.


Email: