header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

YOUTUBE AS A SOURCE OF PATIENT INFORMATION FOR KNEE ARTHROPLASTY AND KNEE ARTHRITIS

International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA) 31st Annual Congress, London, England, October 2018. Part 1.



Abstract

PURPOSE

YouTube is a video sharing platform that is a common resource for patients seeking medical information. The objective of this study is to assess the educational quality of YouTube videos pertaining to total knee arthroplasty and knee arthritis.

METHODS

A systematic search for the terms “knee replacement” and “knee arthritis” was performed using Youtube's search function. Data from the 60 most relevant videos were collected for each search term. Videos not in English or those without audio or captions were excluded. Quality assessment checklists with a scale of 0 to 10 points were developed to evaluate the video content. Videos were grouped into poor quality (grade 0–3), acceptable quality (grade 4–7) and excellent quality (grade 8– 10), respectively. Four independent reviewers assessed the videos using the same grading system and independently scored all videos. Discrepancies regarding the scoring were clarified by consensus discussion.

RESULTS

Overall 106 videos were categorized. For videos regarding total knee replacements, the average number of views was 135,074 with an average duration of 14.53 minutes. Half of the videos were published by a physician or hospital sponsor and were for educational purposes. 64% of videos were of poor educational quality (32/50), 28% were of acceptable quality (14/50), and 8% were of good educational quality (4/50). Common missing information included discussion of surgical complications and implant duration. For videos regarding knee arthritis, the average number of views was 243,346 with an average duration of 4.97 minutes. 39% were published by a physician or hospital sponsor, with 64% of videos made for educational purposes. 66% of videos were of poor educational quality (37/56), 32% were of acceptable quality (18/56), and 2% were of good educational quality. The most common missing information were causes and risk factors for knee arthritis and long-term prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that YouTube is a poor educational source for patients regarding knee arthroplasty and knee arthritis. Recognizing the limitations of YouTube as well as which topics are not commonly presented may guide clinicians to better educate their patients.


Email: