Abstract
Introduction
Intramedullary nailing is gaining popularity for treatment of distal tibial fractures due to short operative time and minimum surgical trauma to soft tissues. Distal tibial fractures are commonly associated with concurrent fibular fractures at, above or below the level of tibial fractures. So far there is no consensus for fixation of fibular fractures.
Materials and Methods
Fractures of fibula at or below the level of fracture of tibia were taken into consideration. Fractures of fibula above the tibial level were excluded because they do not add to stability of fracture fixation. Retrospective study was done and distal tibia-fibula fractures were separated into 2 groups based on whether fibula was fixed or not. Measures of angulation were obtained from radiographs taken immediately after the surgery, a second time 3 months later, and at 6-month follow-up.
Results
35 fracture of distal tibia and fibula were included in study. Fibula was not fixed in 21 cases while 14 fibular fixations were carried out either using short plates(8) or intramedullary pins(6). No significant differences were observed for malalignment in fracture of fibula at the level of tibial fractures. However for fractures of fibula at a level lower than its tibial counterpart, fixation of fibula significantly reduced malalignment.
Conclusion
Fixation of fibula has a definite role in reducing malunion in cases where fibula was fractured below the level of tibial fracture. Fixation of fibula may increase overall stability of fixation of tibia and reduce malunion.
