header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

HIGH-ENERGY FOCUSED EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE THERAPY IN ADDITION TO CONVENTIONAL TREATMENT: RESULTS FROM AN IN VIVO RABBIT MODEL OF FRACTURE-RELATED INFECTION

European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) meeting, Antwerp, Belgium, September 2019.



Abstract

Aim

Focused high energy extracorporeal shockwave therapy (fhESWT) is used to support fracture healing in non-union cases and has been shown to have antibacterial effects. We trialed fhESWT as an adjunct to conventional treatment in a clinically relevant rabbit model of fracture related infection.

Method

A complete humeral osteotomy was performed in 31 rabbits and fixed with a 7-hole-LCP. A fracture-related infection (FRI) was established with Staphylococcus aureus. After two weeks, a revision surgery was performed with debridement, irrigation and implant retention. Rabbits then received: no further treatment (controls); shockwaves (at day 2 and 6 after revision, 4'000 Impulses each time with 23kV); systemic antibiotics (rifampin and nafcillin) over one week in weight adjusted dosages; or the combination of antibiotics and shockwaves. Treatments were applied over one week. Blood cultures were taken before and after shockwave sessions. After an additional week without treatment, rabbits were euthanized, and quantitative bacteriology was performed on implants and tissues to determine infection burden. Indicator organs (brain, heart, liver, lungs, kidneys and spleen) were cultured to assess possible bacteraemia due to fhESWT.

Results

All rabbits were infected at revision surgery as determined by bacteriological culture of debrided materials. fhESWT in combination with antibiotic treatment lowered the bacterial burden at euthanasia hundredfold compared to antibiotic treatment alone in all samples (p=0.38). This effect was most prevalent for the implant sample (p=0.08). No significant effect was seen for fhESWT alone compared to untreated controls. No signs of bacteraemia occurred.

Conclusions

The additon of systemic antibiotics had the biggest effect on reduction of bacteria. Although further lowering the bacterial burden in our model the effect of fhESWT as an adjunct was not big enough to be statistically secured in this in vivo rabbit model. In certain difficult-to-treat infections the addition of fhESWT might be beneficial. The method appears to be safe in this model of acute FRI as no signs of bacteremia occurred despite the high energy and impulse number. Further investigations are needed to identify the correct indication.


E-mail: