header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

RISK FACTORS FOR CUTIBACTERIUM ACNES SPINAL IMPLANT INFECTION: A CASE CONTROL STUDY

European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) meeting, Antwerp, Belgium, September 2019.



Abstract

Aim

Cutibacterium acnes is a significant cause of late-onset spinal implant infection (SII). In addition, usual preoperative prophylactic measures may be insufficient to prevent C. acnes operating site colonisation and infection, as demonstrated for prosthetic shoulder surgery. However, little information is available regarding risk factors for SII due to this microorganism. The aims of this study were to determine the characteristics of and risk factors for C. acnes SII.

Method

we conducted a retrospective unmatched case-control study including all adult patients treated for mono and polymicrobial C. acnes SII during 2010–2015. Controls were randomly selected among patients diagnosed with SII due to other microorganisms during the same period.

Results

Fifty-nine patients with C. acnes SII were compared with 59 controls. There was no difference in sex distribution (39% vs 53% men). Patients with C. acnes SII were younger (median age 42 vs. 65, p< 0.001), thinner (median body mass index (BMI) 21 vs. 25 kg/m2, p< 0.001), and presented a better health status (ASA score≤ 2, 83% vs. 65%, p= 0.015; and presence of immunosuppression, 3% vs. 27%, p= 0.002). Patients with C. acnes SII were more likely to experience delayed/late infections (i.e. diagnosed >3 months post-instrumentation, 66% vs. 22%, p< 0.001) and to be instrumented for scoliosis (83% vs. 27%, p< 0.001) with an extended osteosynthesis (median number of fused vertebrae 12 vs. 5, p< 0.001). However, 20 C. acnes SII (34%) developed early (≤3 months) after instrumentation. The clinical presentation was significantly more indolent in the C. acnes group (presence of fever, 27% vs. 61%, p= 0.001; wound inflammation 39% vs. 61%, p< 0.001 and median C-reactive protein level 38 vs. 146 mg/L).

Mixed C. acnes SII were diagnosed on 24 occasions (41%), 22 of which involving both C. acnes and staphylococcal strains.

In the multivariate logistic regression model, factors independently associated with the development of SII involving C. acnes were age less than 65 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 7.13, 95% CI [2.44–24.4], p= 0.001), BMI< 22kg/m2 (aOR 3.71 [1.34–10.7], p= 0.012) and a number of fused vertebrae >10 (aOR 3.90 IC 95% [1.51–10.4], p= 0.005).

Conclusions

There were significant differences between SII involving C. acnes and those involving other microorganisms. We identified a specific profile of patients at increased risk of developing C. acnes SII. These findings could contribute to improve both the prevention and treatment of such infections.


E-mail: