header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

POLYMICROBIAL INFECTIONS AND MICROBIAL PATTERNS IN SEPTIC NONUNIONS: A DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF 42 CASES

European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) meeting, Antwerp, Belgium, September 2019.



Abstract

Introduction

Polymicrobial infections are expected to complicate the treatment of bone and joint infections. Septic nonunions often occur after initial open fractures, which prophylactically receive broad-spectrum antibiotics. However, no data that describes frequencies of polymicrobial infections and pathogens evident in course of the treatment of septic nonunions is published. Therefore, this study aims at investigating the frequency and pathogen types in polymicrobial infections.

Methods

Surgically treated Patients with long bone septic nonunion admitted between January 2010 and March 2018 were included in the study. Following parameters were examined: age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, body mass index (BMI), and anatomical location of the infected nonunion. Microbiological culture data, polymerase-chain-reaction results of tissue samples, sonication, and joint fluid of the initial and follow-up revision surgeries were assessed. No exclusion criteria were determined.

Results

The study encompassed 42 patients with a mean age of 53.9 ± 17.7 years (range, 23 – 93). Sixteen (38.1%) patients were female. In 46.3% of the patients open fractures led to septic nonunion. Twenty-six nonunions occurred at the tibia or fibula, 11 were localized at the femur, 2 at the humerus and 3 at the forearm. Only 2 patients were assessed as ASA type 1, while 26 were ASA type 2 and 12 patients ASA type 3. Mean number of performed surgeries was 6 ± 0.67 (range 2 – 21). In 6 patients (14.3%) polymicrobial infection were evident. A change of evidenced pathogens in course of the treatment occurred in 21 patients (50%). In 16 patients (38.1%) previously detected bacteria could be evidenced by microbial testing after further revision surgery. Staphylococcus aureus was most often evident (n=34, 30.6%), followed by Enterococcus species (n=25, 22.5%) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (n=18, 16.2%). Five Staphylococcus aureus were resistant to methicillin (MRSA). In patients without polymicrobial infection or further germ detection in course of the treatment 86.4% of the infections were due to Staphylococcus species. Patients with change of detected pathogens and polymicrobial infections suffered from more enterococci infections. Infections due to streptococci and gram-negative bacteria could only be evidenced in patients with polymicrobial infection and pathogen change in course of the treatment.

Conclusion

The observed difference of microbiological patterns in septic nonunion may help to facilitate adjuvant local and systemic antibiotic treatment in septic nonunion patients. Reasons for the observed difference of microbiological patterns and its influence on patient outcome have still to be elucidated.


E-mail: