header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

ANTIMICROBIAL EFFECT OF CERAMENT-G® ON BACTERIAL ISOLATES, WITH VARIOUS LEVELS OF GENTAMICIN RESISTANCE, FOUND IN FRACTURE-RELATED INFECTION: AN IN VITRO STUDY

European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) meeting, Antwerp, Belgium, September 2019.



Abstract

Aim

Fracture-related infection (FRI) is a serious complication after trauma. More often resistant micro-organisms are cultured. Gentamicin covers a wide variety of causative agents for FRI. A bio-absorbable antibiotic carrier, Cerament-G®, combines dead space management with local release of gentamicin in a one-stage approach. The achieved tissue concentrations of locally applied antibiotics are 4–8 thousand times higher than after systemic administration. Does Cerament-G® have antimicrobial activity towards bacteria that are not susceptible to systemic gentamicin administration.

Method

The four most often cultured bacterial species found in FRI were used; Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter cloacae. For each species, four different isolates were obtained, each with a different susceptibility for gentamicin. This susceptibility, expressed in the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), varied from completely susceptible (MIC 0,064 mg/L – 4mg/L), minimal resistance (4mg/L – 16mg/L), moderate resistance (8 mg/L – 96 mg/L) to high resistance (24 mg/L - >1024 mg/L), depending on each different organism. Antimicrobial activity of Cerament-G® was determent by a Kirby-Bauer test, according to the EUCAST disc protocol. Each test was done in five-fold for each of the 16 cultured isolates, four of each species. The zone of inhibition (ZOI), obtained by the test, was compared between each bacterial isolate and within each of the four separate species.

Results

Cerament-G® shows antimicrobial activity against S. aureus, S. epidermidis, P. aeruginosa and E. cloacae. ZOI-values varied from 11 to 44 mm. It was negatively correlated with the MIC; the higher the MIC, the less the antimicrobial effect of Cerament-G®. Between bacterial isolates with the same MIC, within the same species, there was no significant difference in ZOI between the five-fold repetitions of the test, indicating an accurate test. The ZOI of the different bacterial isolates (with different MIC's), belonging to the same bacterial species, differed significantly. Of all 16 isolates, only the S. aureus with a MIC of >1024 mg/L did not show antimicrobial activity of Cerament-G®; ZOI =0mm.

Conclusions

This study shows that Cerament-G® has antimicrobial activity against bacterial isolates, resistant to gentamicin when systemically treated. This confirms that the cut-off point for systemic application is not very useful for the local use of Cerament-G® and emphasizes the need for optimization and change of current antibiotic protocols to increase the durability and sustainability of antibiotic FRI treatment.


E-mail: