Abstract
Introduction
The anatomic dual mobility (ADM) technology utilized a monoblock cobalt chromium acetabular component. However, design limitations conferred difficulties controlling orientation during component insertion and inability to confirm full implant seating; the solution resulted in the creation of the modular dual mobility (MDM). The modular implant combines a standard titanium acetabular component and a cobalt chromium liner insert. Due to the metal-on-metal interface on MDM implants, fretting and corrosion releasing metal ions like previous metal-on-metal THA implants, were a concern. This study prospectively reviewed metal ions (cobalt, chromium and titanium) on patients who were at least 1 year post MDM implantation and compared them to patients with an ADM implant and evaluated radiographic seating of the components.
Methods
All patients with ADM and MDM implants underwent evaluation of metal ions (cobalt, chromium and titanium) at their one year follow-up appointment. Radiographic evaluation for acetabular polar gaps was performed. Elevated metal ions were determined using standard laboratory ranges. Differences in baseline demographics were assessed using the Mann Whitney-U test and Fishers's exact test. Differences in metal ions and implant type were compared using the Fisher's exact tests.
Results
Fifty consecutive patients (25 ADM and 25 MDM were included in the study. All patients in the ADM group were primary THR and all in the MDM group were revision THR. Mean age and BMI were 73 (+/−10) and 26 (+/−4) respectively. A majority of the participants were female (72%), overall mean length of implantation was 1.2 years. We found no difference in metal ion elevation between groups at a minimum of one year post implantation (cobalt, p=1.0, chromium, p=0.49; titanium p=1.0). Within the MDM and ADM cohorts, there were an equal number of patients with mildly elevated cobalt (n=6), as well as mildly elevated titanium (n=1). The ADM cohort had more patients with increased chromium when compared to the MDM cohort (ADM=1 vs MDM=0), but did not reach significance. There was one ADM patient with significantly elevated levels of cobalt and chromium probably related to prior spine fusion with dissimilar metal fixation. When reviewed as raw values, there was a difference in mean chromium levels between ADM and MDM cohorts (ADM=1.4 (+/− 2.5) vs MDM=1.2 (+/− 1.7), p=0.03; no other significant differences were found. An additional 32 ADM have been evaluated recently without elevation in cobalt or chromium levels. Of the total 55 ADM patients 4 had a 1mm polar gaps which filled in at 6–23 months postoperative. There were no polar gaps in the MDM series and one malseated liner.
Conclusion
There were no significant differences in metal ion elevation minimum one year post implantation between primary ADM and revision MDM cohorts. This is encouraging based on the titanium/cobalt chrome interface in the MDM implant. Uncommon dome gaps in the monoblock ADM is not a clinical problem.
For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly.
