Abstract
Introduction
Tibial component loosening is a frequent cause of failure in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Management options include isolated tibial component revision or full component revision. A full component revision is frequently selected by surgeons who are unfamiliar with the existing implant or have a “let's just start over attitude.” This option adds morbidity versus isolated tibial exchange. While isolated tibial exchange has lower morbidity, it is technically more challenging with regard to exposure and maintaining prosthetic stability. This study was designed to compare these two reconstructive options.
Methods
Patients revised for isolated aseptic tibial loosening were identified from 2012–2017. Patients with revision implants, or those revised for infection, instability, osteolysis, or femoral component loosening were excluded. 161 patients met these criteria, 85 patients had an isolated tibial revision and 76 had revision of both components despite having only a loose tibial component. Patient demographics as well as clinical and radiographic outcomes were recorded for each cohort.
Results
Patient demographical information, including age, gender, and BMI were statistically similar between the two cohorts. Median follow-up was 3.5 years. Supplemental metaphyseal fixation was used in 22 patients in the isolated tibial cohort and 19 of the full revision cohort. There was a higher incidence of radiographic loosening in the full component revision cohort (10.5% vs. 6.0%; p=0.28). There were five failures requiring revision in the isolated tibial cohort, two for sepsis, one for repeat isolated tibial loosening, one for femoral aseptic loosening, and one for an extensor mechanism disruption. There were eight failures in the full component cohort, three for patellar avascular necrosis, two for sepsis, one for repeat tibial loosening, one for arthrofibrosis, and one for a postoperative wound dehiscence.
Conclusion
Isolated tibial revision for aseptic tibial loosening has similar clinical and radiographic results when compared to full component revision. Although no intraoperative complications were identified when revising the femur, there is the potential for complications unique to femoral revision. Femoral component revision for isolated tibial loosening is unnecessary and should be avoided provided adequate ligamentous stability can be obtained.
Keywords: Aseptic loosening, Tibial loosening, revision total knee replacement, total knee replacement.
For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly.
