Abstract
Introduction
In total hip arthroplasty, press-fit anchorage is one of the most common fixation methods for acetabular cups and mostly ensures sufficient primary stability. Nevertheless, implants may fail due to aseptic loosening over time, especially when the surrounding bone is affected by stress-shielding. The use of acetabular cups made of isoelastic materials might help to avoid stress-shielding and osteolysis.
The aim of the present numerical study was to determine whether a modular acetabular cup with a shell made of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) may be an alternative to conventional titanium shells (Ti6Al4V). For this purpose, a 3D finite element analysis was performed, in which the implantation of modular acetabular cups into an artificial bone stock using shells made of either PEEK or Ti6Al4V, was simulated with respect to stresses and deformations within the implants.
Methods
The implantation of a modular cup, consisting of a shell made of PEEK or Ti6Al4V and an insert made of either ceramic or polyethylene (PE), into a bone cavity made of polyurethane foam (20 pcf), was analysed by 3D finite element simulation. A two-point clamping cavity was chosen to represent a worst-case situation in terms of shell deformation. Five materials were considered; with Ti6Al4V and ceramic being defined as linear elastic and PE and PEEK as plastic materials. The artificial bone stock was simulated as a crushable foam. Contacts were generated between the cavity and shell (μ = 0.5) and between the shell and insert (μ = 0.16). In total, the FE models consisted of 45,282 linear hexahedron elements and the implantation process was simulated in four steps: 1. Displacement driven insertion of the cup; 2. Relief of the cup; 3. Displacement driven placement of the insert; 4. Load driven insertion of the insert (maximum push-in force of 500 N). The FE model was evaluated with respect to the radial deformations of the shell and insert as well as the principal stresses in case of the ceramic inserts. The model was experimentally validated via comparison of nominal strains of the titanium shells.
Results
The maximum radial deformation of the shell made of PEEK was 581 μm (insertion) and 470 μm (relief) and therefore multiple times higher compared to the Ti6Al4V shell (42 μm and 21 μm). As a result, larger deformations occurred at the PE and ceramic inserts in combination with the PEEK shell. Partially, the deformations were above an usual clearance of 100 μm. When the ceramic insert was combined with the shell made of PEEK, maximum principal stresses in the ceramic insert amounted to 30 MPa and were clearly lower than approved bending strength of the ceramic material (948 MPa).
Conclusion
The examined acetabular shell made of PEEK was intensively deformed during insertion compared to the geometrically identical Ti6Al4V shell and is therefore not suitable for modular acetabular cups. In future studies it should be clarified to what extent acetabular cups with shells made of carbon fiber reinforced PEEK materials with higher stiffness lead to reduced deformations during the insertion procedure.
