Abstract
Introduction
Hoffa fractures are rare, intra-articular fractures of the femoral condyle in the coronal plane and involving the weight-bearing surface of the distal femur. Surgical fixation is warranted to achieve stability, early mobilisation and satisfactory knee function.
We describe a unique type of Hoffa fracture in the coronal plane with sagittal split and intra-articular comminution. There is scant evidence in current literature with regards to surgical approaches, techniques and implants. We report of our case with a review of the literature.
Case report
A 40 year old male motorcyclist was involved in a high speed road traffic collision. X-rays confirmed displaced unicondylar fracture of the lateral femoral condyle. CT showed sagittal split of the Hoffa fragment and intra-articular comminution. MRI showed partial rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. The patient underwent definitive surgical treatment via a midline skin incision and lateral parapatellar approach using cannulated screws, headless compression screws and anti-glide plate. Weightbearing was commenced at 8 weeks. Arthroscopy and adhesiolysis was performed at 12 weeks to improve range of motion. The patient was discharged at one year with a pain-free, functional knee.
Discussion
Hoffa fractures are high-energy fractures, often seen in young male motorcyclists with flexed and slightly abducted knee. Most papers recommend surgical fixation, however there is no widely accepted surgical method or rehabilitation regime. Varying surgical approaches, screw direction, choice of implants, and post-operative care have been described. Surgical approach depends on the configuration of the fracture. The medial/lateral parapatellar approach is commonly used as it does not compromise future arthroplasty, but it does not allow access to fix posterior comminution. Arthroscopic-assistance may be used with good outcomes and less tissue dissection. AP screws are widely reported in the literature, most likely due to easier access to the fracture site. PA screws may provide better stability, but access is more difficult. Fixation often involves passing screws through the articular surface, therefore the area damaged should be kept to a minimum by using the smallest possible screw; headless compression screws leave a smaller footprint in the articular cartilage. Locking plate augmentation generally gives good outcomes.
Conclusion
Hoffa fractures are rare and difficult to treat. Surgical treatment is the best choice for optimum post-operative knee function. There is no consensus on choice of surgical approaches, techniques and implants, as these are dependent on fracture configuration. In this particular case we emphasise the importance of using an anti-glide plate to address the sagittal component. Despite the need for a secondary procedure, the treatment has had positive outcomes and may be used as a guide for treatment of future Hoffa fractures of a similar sub-type.
