Abstract
Background
Training within surgery is changing from the traditional Halstedian apprenticeship model. There is need for objective assessment of trainees, especially their technical skills, to ensure they are safe to practice and to highlight areas for development. In addition, due to working time restrictions in both the UK and the US, theatre time is being limited for trainees, reducing their opportunities to learn such technical skills. Simulation is one adjunct to training that can be utilised to both assess trainees objectively, and provide a platform for trainees to develop their skills in a safe and controlled environment. The insertion of a dynamic hip screw (DHS) relies on complex psychomotor skills to obtain an optimal implant position. The tip-apex distance (TAD) is a measurement of this positioning, used to predict failure of the implant. These skills can be obtained away from theatre using workshop bone simulation, however this method does not utilise fluoroscopy due to the associated radiation risks. FluoroSim is a novel digital fluoroscopy simulator that can recreate digital radiographs with workshop bone simulation for the insertion of a DHS guide-wire. In this study, we present the training effect demonstrated on FluoroSim. The null hypothesis states that no difference will be present between users with different amounts of exposure to FluoroSim.
Methods
Medical students were recruited from three London universities and randomised into a training (n=23) and a control (n=22) cohort. All participants watched a video explanation of the simulator and task and were blinded to their allocation. Training participants completed 10 attempts in total, 5 attempts in week one, followed by a one week wash out period, followed by 5 attempts in week 2. The control group completed a single attempt each week. For each attempt, 5 metrics were recorded; TAD, procedural time, number of radiographs, number of guide-wire retires and cut-out rate (COR).
Results
No significant difference was present for any metric between the groups at baseline; randomisation had produced heterogeneous groups minimising selection bias. Intragroup training effect (comparison of initial and last attempt) was significant for all metrics in the training group (p < 0.05) but for no metrics in the control group. The intergroup training effect (comparison of training group attempt ten to control group attempt ten) was present for procedural time, number of radiographs and number of guide-wire retries (p < 0.05). Significance was not reached for TAD and COR.
Conclusion
FluoroSim shows skill acquisition with repeat exposure, so the null hypothesis can be rejected. This study has demonstrated the merits of FluoroSim as a training adjunct for psychomotor skill development in a DHS setting.
