Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Staphylococci species account for ∼80 % of osteomyelitis cases. While the most severe infections are caused by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), the clinical significance of coagulase negative Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) infections remain controversial. In general, S. epidermidis was known to be a protective commensal bacterium. However, recent studies have shown that intra-operative low-grade S. epidermidis contamination prevents bone healing. Thus, the purpose of this study is to compare the pathogenic features of S. aureus and S. epidermidis in an established murine model of implant-associated osteomyelitis.
METHODS
All animal experiments were performed on IACUC approved protocols. USA300LAC (MRSA) and RP62A(S. epidermidis) were used as prototypic bacterial strains. After sterilization, stainless steel pins were implanted into the tibiae of BALB/c mice (n=5 each) with or without Staphylococci. Mice were euthanized on day 14, and the implants were removed for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Tibiae were fixed for mCT prior to decalcification for histology.
RESULTS
The histology of S. aureus infected tibiae demonstrated massive osteolysis and abscesses formation. In contrast, the histology from S. epidermidis infected tibiae was indistinguishable from uninfected controls. Gross mCT analyses revealed massive bone defects around the infected implant with reactive bone formation only in the S. aureus group. The osteolysis findings were confirmed by quantitative analysis, as the medial hole area of S. aureus infected tibiae (1.67 ± 0.37 mm2) was larger than uninfected (0.15 ± 0.10 mm2) (p < 0.001) and S. epidermidis (0.19 ± 0.14 mm2) (p < 0.001) groups. Consistently, the %biofilm area on the implants of the S. aureus group (39.0 ± 13.7 %) was significantly larger than uninfected (6.3 ± 2.3 %) (p < 0.001) and S. epidermidis (12.9 ± 7.4 %) (p < 0.001). Although the amount of biofilm of S. epidermidis was much smaller than S. aureus, the presence of bacteria on the implant were confirmed by SEM. In addition, the empty lacunae, which is a feature of mature biofilm and evidence of bacterial emigration, were also present on both S. epidermidis and S. aureus infected implants.
DISCUSSION
In this study, we confirmed the aggressive pathologic features S. aureus on host bone, soft tissues and biofilm formation. In contrast, we show that S. epidermidis is incapable of inducing osteolysis, reactive bone formation or soft tissue abscesses, even though it colonizes the implant in small biofilms. Collectively, the results support a potential role for S. epidermidis in implant loosening and fracture non-unions, as the bacteria can form small biofilms that could interfere with osseous integration and bone healing. However, future studies are warranted to assess the effects of S. epidermidis biofilm on implant loosening.
