Abstract
Purpose
Addressing posterior tibial plateau fractures is increasingly recognized as an important prognostic factor for functional outcome. The treatment of posterior tibial plateau fractures is rather demanding and the implants are still standard, off-the-shelf implants. This emphasizes the need for a more thorough morphological study of the posterior tibial plateau, in order to treat these posterior fractures more adequately. We aimed to demonstrate anatomical variations of the tibia in order to develop better implants.
Method
After approval of the ethical committee 22 historically available CT scans of intact left tibia”s were segmented using Mimics (Materialise, Belgium). In order to perform principal component analysis, corresponding meshes are necessary. Mesh correspondence was achieved by deforming one selected source tibia to every other target tibia, through non rigid registration. The non-rigid registration algorithm was based on the algorithm described by Amberg et al (ref). After performing the non-rigid registration, principal component analysis was performed in Matlab (Mathworks, USA).
Results
The first 3 components account for 98,1% of the anatomical shape variation of the tibia. The first principal component accounts for 95,4, the second accounts for 1,6% and the third component accounts for the remaining 1,1% of variation.
In the first principal component the most marked variation was the length and the shaft width. Shorter tibia”s have a steeper and more angled posterior medial and lateral plateau as where longer tibia”s have a more rounded posterior tibia plateau. On the distal end, the tip of the medial malleolus is more prominent in shorter tibia”s than in longer tibia”s. The orientation of the tibiofibular joint is directed more posteriorly in larger tibias where it is orientated more laterally in smaller tibia”s. The slope of the medial and lateral tibia plateau is not related to the length or width of the plateau.
The second principal component shows a relationship between a valgus shaped tibia shaft and its relation to a relatively smaller medial plateau”s compared with straight tibia”s of the same length. Valgus shaped, small tibia shafts have more posteriorly tilted lateral plateau”s compared with straight, broad shafted tibias.
The third principal component shows that an angular shaped posterior tibia plateau is related to a more increased anterior bowing. The increase in the posterior tilt is mostly marked in the medial tibia plateau.
Conclusion
The majority of tibia shape variations is directly related to the length of the shaft. The clinically known varus and valgus deformations represent only a small percentage of the total variation. Nevertheless, their variation within the second component is large and has a direct relation to the morphology of the tibia plateau. This data coud furthermore be used to improve implant design.
