Abstract
Objective
Full-thickness cartilage defects are commonly found in symptomatic knee patients, and are associated with progressive cartilage degeneration. Although the risk of defect progression to degenerative osteoarthritis is multifactorial, articular cartilage defects change contact mechanics and the mechanical response of tissue adjacent to the defect. The objective of this study was to quantify changes in intra-tissue strain patterns occurring at the defect rim and opposing tissue in an experimental model mimicking in vivo cartilage-on-cartilage contact conditions.
Methods
Macroscopically intact osteochondral explants with smooth surfaces were harvested form the femoral condyles of 9 months old bovine knees. Two groups were tested; reference group with intact cartilage (n=8) and defect group with a full thickness cylindrical defect (diameter 8 mm) in one cartilage surface from each pair (n=8). The explants with defect articular surface and the opposing intact cartilage were compressed at ∼0.33 times body weight (350N) during cycles of 2s loading followed by 1.4s unloading. In plane tissue deformations were measured using displacement encoded imaging with stimulated echoes (DENSE) on a 9.4T MRI scanner. A two-sample t-test was used to assess statistical significance (p<0.05) of differences in maximal Green-Lagrange strains between the defect, opposing surface and intact reference cartilage.
Results
Strain levels were elevated in the cartilage neighbouring the defect rim and in the opposing articulating surface. Similar to intact cartilage, compressive and tensile strains presented a depth dependent variation. The maximal strains profiles were highest in the superficial zone and decreased with depth for all explants, except for the shear strains in the cartilage opposing the defect which were constant.
The maximal tensile strain in the middle and superficial zone were significantly higher for the defect cartilage (3.97±1.99% and 4.52±2.04%) compared to the intact reference (1.91±1.13% and 2.53±1.27%), indicating that the defect edges are bulging towards the defect. The shear strains were significantly higher (∼1.5x) throughout cartilage depth of the defect rim compared to the intact reference cartilage. However, in the cartilage opposing the defect, shear strains were significantly lower (∼0.5x) compared to the intact cartilage representing less matrix distortion. No significant difference in maximal compressive strains were observed between the opposing intact and defect at all cartilage depths.
Conclusions
Presence of isolated full thickness cartilage defects will affect the cartilage deformations. Even under pure compressive loading alone, the altered contact mechanics resulted in excessive strains at tissue adjacent to the defect potentially damaging the cartilage and inducing tissue degeneration.
