header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

THE COMBINED USE OF CARBON NANOTUBES WITH SYNHETIC CERAMICS ENHANCES POSTEROLATERAL FUSION: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON RAT SPINAL FUSION MODEL

The European Orthopaedic Research Society (EORS) 25th Annual and Anniversary Meeting, Munich, Germany, September 2017. Part 1 of 2.



Abstract

Background context

Fusion is a fundamental procedure in spine surgery. Although autogenous grafts have ideal bone graft characteristics, their use may remain limited due to various morbidities. Even though ceramic based synthetic bone grafts are used commonly at present, in order to enhance their efficacy, their combined use with other materials has been investigated. The use of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) together with synthetic bone grafts such as hydroxyapatite (HA) has contributed to positive developments in bone tissue engineering.

Purpose

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of CNTs/ HA- tricalcium phosphate (TCP) composite prepared in posterolateral spinal fusion model.

Study Design/Setting

Experimental animal study.

Methods

At first, CNTs and CNTs/HA-TCP composites were prepared. Twenty adult male Spraque Dawley rats were randomized into four groups with five rats in each group. Decortication was carried out in standard manner in all animals. Group 1 (only decortication), group 2 (CNTs), group 3 (HA-TCP) and group 4 (CNTs/HA-TCP) were formed. Eight weeks later all animals were sacrificed and obtained fusion segments were evaluated by manual palpation, histomorphometry and micro computed tomography (mCT).

Results

In all evaluations, highest fusion values were obtained in Group 4. In mCT investigations, bone volume/ tissue volume (BV/TV) ratio was found to be significantly higher in composite group (group 4) only compared to ceramic group (group 3). Although in Group 2, in which only CNTs were used, the ratio was found to be significantly higher than group 1, the difference was not considered significant in terms of fusion and in addition in group 2, CNTs were completely surrounded by fibrous tissue, i.e. no bone formation was observed.

Conclusions

The combined use of carbon nanotubes with ceramic based bone grafts enhances spinal fusion markedly. Although CNTs are inadequate in producing spinal fusion when they are used by themselves, due to especially their high biocompatibillity and unique bicomechanic characteristics compatible with bone tissue, they increase fusion rates significantly, particularly together with ceramic based synthetic grafts.

Keywords

Spinal fusion; Rat; Carbon nanotube(s); Ceramic(s); Bone graft subsitutes; Hydroxyapatite


Email: