header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

FACTORS AFFECTING BONE FORMATION IN INFECTED DEFECTS FILLED WITH AN ABSORBABLE, ANTIBIOTIC-LOADED BONE SUBSTITUTE

The European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) 2018 Meeting, Helsinki, Finland, September 2018.



Abstract

Aim

Antibiotic-loaded biomaterials are often used in dead space management after excision of infected bone. This study assessed the chronological progression of new bone formation in infected defects, filled only with an absorbable, osteoconductive bone void filler with Gentamicin (1).

Method

163 patients were treated for osteomyelitis or infected fractures with a single-stage excision, implantation of antibiotic carrier, stabilisation and wound closure. All had Cierny & Mader Type III (n=128) or Type IV (n=35) infection. No bone grafting was performed in any patient.

Patients were followed up for a minimum of 12 months (mean 21.4 months; 12–56). Bone void filling was assessed on serial digitised, standardized radiographs taken immediately after surgery, at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months and then yearly. Data on defect size, location, degree of void filling, quality of the bone-biomaterial interface and material leakage were collected.

Bone formation was calculated at final follow-up, as a percentage of initial defect volume, by determining the bone area on AP and lateral radiographs to the nearest 5%.

Results

138 patients had adequate radiographs for assessment. Infection was eradicated in 95.7%. 2.5% of patients suffered a fracture during follow-up. Overall, bone formation was good (mean 73.8% defect filling), with one quarter of patients having complete defect filling and 87% having more than 50% of the defect healed. Bone formed better in metaphyseal defects compared to diaphyseal defects (mean 79% filling vs 66%; p<0.02). Good interdigitation of the biomaterial with the host bone, seen on the initial radiograph, was associated with more bone formation (77% vs 69%; p=0.021). Leakage of the biomaterial out of the defect reduced mean bone formation from 77% to 62% (p=0.006).

38 cases had radiographs more than 2 years after implantation. In 24 (63.2%), bone formation continued to increase after the first year radiograph.

Conclusion

This biomaterial was effective in allowing significant amounts of bone to form in the defect. This removed the need for bone grafting in this series, with a low risk of fracture or recurrent infection. However, bone formation is affected by the site of the lesion and the adequacy of filling at surgery. It is important to achieve good contact between the bone surface and the biomaterial at operation. Bone formation is slow and progresses for at least 2 years after implantation, in two thirds of patients.


Email: