Abstract
Aim
Diagnosing Fracture-Related Infections (FRI) is challenging. White blood cell (WBC) scintigraphy is considered the best nuclear imaging technique to diagnose FRI; a recent study by our group found a diagnostic accuracy of 92%. However, many centers use 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) which has several logistic advantages. Whether 18F-FDG-PET/CT has better diagnostic performance than white blood cell (WBC) scintigraphy is uncertain. Therefore, we aimed: 1) to determine the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG-PET/CT for diagnosing FRI (defined as infection following an open fracture or fracture surgery) and 2) to determine cut-off values of standardized uptake values (SUV) that result in optimal diagnostic performance.
Method
This retrospective cohort study included all consecutive patients who received 18F-FDG-PET/CT to diagnose FRI in two level 1 trauma centers. Baseline demographic- and surgical characteristics were retrospectively reviewed. The reference standard consisted of at least 2 representative microbiological culture results or the presence or absence of clinical confirmatory FRI signs in at least 6 months of clinical follow-up. A nuclear medicine specialist, blinded to the reference standard, re-reviewed all scans. Additionally, SUVs were measured using the “European Association of Nuclear Medicine Research Ltd. (EARL)” reconstructed 18F-FDG-PET/CT scans. Volume of interests were drawn around the suspected- and corresponding contralateral area to obtain the absolute values (SUVmax) and the ratio between suspected and contralateral area (SUVratio). Diagnostic accuracy of the re-reviewed scans was calculated (sensitivity and specificity). Additionally, diagnostic characteristics of the SUV measurements were plotted in the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC). The sensitivity and specificity at the optimal threshold was deducted from the AUROC with the Q-point method.
Results
158 18F-FDG-PET/CTs were included. Mean age was 46.2 years, 71.5% was male. Most cases (56.3%) were tibial shaft- or ankle fractures. Sixty patients (38.0%) had FRI. The sensitivity and specificity of the FDG-PET/CT scan was 70.0% (95% CI 56.8–81.2) and 79.6% (95% CI 70.3–87.1) respectively. Diagnostic accuracy was 76.0% (95% CI 68.5–82.4). AUROCs of SUVmax and SUVratio were 0.80 (95% CI 0.73–0.87) and 0.73 (95% CI 0.64–0.81), respectively. The optimal SUVmax threshold of 4.2 resulted in 80.0% sensitivity and 71.3% specificity, while an SUVratio of 2.9 resulted in 58.3% sensitivity and 80.9% specificity.
Conclusions
The 18F-FDG-PET/CT has a sensitivity of 70.0%, specificity of 79.6% and a diagnostic accuracy of 76.0%. This makes 18F-FDG-PET/CT less accurate than WBC scintigraphy in diagnosing FRI, although adding SUV measurements may possibly increase its diagnostic accuracy.
