header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

PREVENTION OF CALCANEAL FRACTURE SYNTHESIS INFECTION USING BONE SUBSTITUTE ELUTING ANTIBIOTIC

The European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) 2018 Meeting, Helsinki, Finland, September 2018.



Abstract

Aim

The optimal treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACF) remains controversial. The operative treatment group has better anatomical recovery, functional outcome scores and less pain than non operative treatment patients, but it may lead to a higher incidence of complications, such as delayed wound healing and surgical site infections. The aim of this study was to analyze the prophylactic effect using a biphasic bone substitute (BS) eluting antibiotic on calcaneal implant-related infections.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective non-randomized review of all patients with DIACF (type Sanders 2, 3, 4) from 2009 to 2017; 103 calcaneal fractures of 90 patients (13 bilaterally) were treated with plates. All cases received the same systemic antibiotic prophylaxis; BS was used on more complex cases with large bone defect and BS was added with antibiotic on higher risk patients. We collected data including complications: major (deep infections, osteomyelitis) and minor complications (wound dehiscence, superficial infection). We considered the absence of deep infections after 6 months. We compared statistically the outcomes of 3 operative groups: the first was treated with plates only (A), the second with plates and BS (B) and the third with plates added with BS eluting antibiotic (vancomicine or gentamicine) (C).

Results

We examined 99 cases (group A: n33, B: n52, C: n14), 4 patients were lost; the mean age was 47,8 years (range 18–83 years). Minimal follow up was 6 months (range: 6 – 42 months).

We have observed 8 (8,1%) implant-related infection (A:4, 12,1%; B:4, 7,7%), 2 (2%) superficial infection (B:2, 3,8%), 20 (20,2%) wound healing defects (A:11, 33,3%; B:7, 13,5%; C:2, 14,2%).

We found a relevant reduction of the rates in the group C regarding the major complications without a statistic evidence.

Conclusion

The three groups are uneven; particularly the group C has a high concentration of more severe risk patients. The low number of cases in the group C, which limited the statistic evidence, represents a second limit. The absence of major infection on group C found in this study, needs larger data to confirm this result. The open surgery has an intrinsic rate of skin complications but the use of BS eluting local antibiotic is an additional tool to manage difficult complex fractures and to prevent implanted-related infection, inhibiting bacterial colonization and biofilm protection, particularly in those patients that have suffered from a minor complication, which could lead to a deep infection.


Email: