Abstract
Aim
We aimed to compare the in vitro antibacterial activity of Bioactive Glass (BAG) S53P4, which is a compound showing local antibacterial activity, to that of antibiotic-loaded polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) against multidrug resistant bacteria from osteomyelitis (OM) and prosthetic joint infection (PJI) isolates.
Method
We studied convenience samples of multidrug resistant (MDR) microorganisms obtained from patients presenting OM and prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Mixtures containing tryptic soy broth (TSB) and inert glass beads (2mm), BAG-S53P4 granules (0.5–0.8mm and <45 mm) and Gentamicin or Vancomycin-loaded PMMA beads were inoculated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (MR-CoNS), Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. Glass beads (2.0mm) were used as a control. Antibacterial activity was evaluated by means of time-kill curve, through seeding the strains on blood agar plates, and subsequently performing colony counts after 24, 48, 72, 96, 120 and 168 hours of incubation. Differences between groups were evaluated by means of two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni's t test.
Results
Inhibition of bacterial growth started soon after 48 hours of incubation, reached zero CFU/ml between 120 and 168 hours of incubation for both antibiotic-loaded PMMA and BAG S53P4 groups, in comparison with inert glass (p< 0.05). No difference regarding time-kill curves between antibiotic-loaded PMMA and BAG S53P4 was observed. Moreover, despite no difference was observed between both Vancomycin - or Gentamicin-loaded PMMA and BAG groups, there was statistical difference between the effectiveness of all treatments (BAG included) against gram-positive cocci and gram-negative bacilli, the latter of which requiring longer time frames for the cultures to yield no bacterial growth.
Conclusions
BAG S53P4 presented antibacterial properties as much as antibiotic-loaded PMMA for MDR bacteria producing OM and PJI, although presenting differences between its effectiveness against different bacterial groups.
