header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

A MOBILE APP FOR POSTOPERATIVE WOUND CARE AFTER JOINT ARTHROPLASTY: PERCEIVED USEFULNESS AND EASE OF USE

The European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) 2018 Meeting, Helsinki, Finland, September 2018.



Abstract

Aim

Early discharge of patients after joint arthroplasty leaves patients responsible for monitoring their postoperative wound by themselves. This might result in a delayed presentation of postoperative complications. The use of a mobile woundcare app by patients after arthroplasty might result in (1) earlier report of complications, (2) an increase in patient satisfaction and (3) insight in the incidence and duration of postoperative wound leakage. Therefore, the ease of use and perceived usefulness of using a postoperative mobile woundcare app in patients after joint arthroplasty was investigated.

Method

A cohort study was conducted in 2017 in 2 Dutch Hospitals. Eligible cases were all consecutive patients that received an arthroplasty and who owned a smartphone. During the first 30 postoperative days, patients filled in daily reviews of their wound and took a photo of the wound. Based on the review, an underlying algorithm calculated daily a score that prompted a mobile alert if needed, which advised patients to contact the hospital. Patients filled in a form on day 30 and day 90 in order to document occurrence of any postoperative wound complication. On day 15 and 30, patients were requested to fill in a questionnaire evaluating the perceived usefulness and the ease of use of the App.

Results

Of 127 eligible patients, 30 (24%) did not have a smartphone. Of the remaining 97 patients, 69 patients (71%) were included. Median age was 68 years (range 33–90 years). Forty-one patients (59.4%) used the app until day 30. On average, the app was used for 19.1 days (95% CI 16.6–21.5). Nine patients (13.0%) stopped using the app directly after the first or second day. The overall mean grade on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) was 4.2 for ease of use and 4.1 for perceived usefulness. The scores on day 30 were comparable to day 15. One patient (1.4%) developed a prosthetic joint infection.

Conclusions

The introduction of a mobile woundcare app resulted in a high overall satisfaction rate with respect to ease of use and perceived usefulness. Daily use of the app did not lead to more stress. Currently, a nationwide cohort study is set up to implement the mobile woundcare app in Dutch hospitals to improve patient care. The app will then also be used to investigate the correlation between duration of postoperative wound leakage after joint arthroplasty and the development of prosthetic joint infection.


Email: