Abstract
Aim
Current guidelines for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) recommend collecting 4–5 independent tissue specimens, with isolation of indistinguishable organisms from two or more specimens. The same principle has been applied to other orthopaedic device-related infections (DRI) including fracture-related infections. However there are few published data validating this approach in DRI other than PJI. We evaluated the performance of different diagnostic cutoffs and varying numbers of tissue specimens for microbiological sampling in fracture-related infections.
Method
We used standard protocols for tissue sample collection and laboratory processing, and a standard clinical definition of fracture-related infection. We explored how tissue culture sensitivity and specificity varied with the number of tissue specimens obtained; and with the number of specimens from which an identical isolate was required (diagnostic cutoff). To model the effect of the number of specimens taken we randomly sampled n specimens from those obtained at each procedure, excluding procedures from which less than n specimens were collected, and calculated sensitivity and specificity based on this sample. For each value of n we repeated this process 100 times to estimate the mean sensitivity and specificity for n specimens.
Results
We analysed data for 246 cases of suspected fracture-related infection. 77 (31%) met the clinical definition of infection. A median of 4 independent tissue samples were obtained from each procedure (IQR 4–5). Culture sensitivity was highest and specificity lowest using a diagnostic cutoff of 1 specimen for isolation of an organism; specificity increased at the expense of sensitivity with diagnostic cutoffs of 2 or 3 specimens. Culture sensitivity increased as the number of tissue specimens obtained increased from 1 to 4. Although there was a corresponding decline in specificity with increasing numbers of tissue specimens obtained, this was negligible when a diagnostic cutoff of 2 or 3 specimens with identical organisms was used. Using a cutoff of 2 specimens with identical organisms, obtaining 4 specimens gave a sensitivity of 68% (55–78%) and a specificity of 95% (86–99%). Small numbers prevented meaningful analysis of the diagnostic performance of five or more specimens.
Conclusions
These data are analogous to findings in prosthetic joint infections, and suggest similar principles may be applied to tissue sampling and culture interpretation in other orthopaedic DRI including fracture-related infection. A larger study is underway to evaluate the performance of greater numbers of tissue specimens.
