Abstract
Introduction
Hip abductor tendon tears have been referred to as “rotator cuff tears of the hip,” and are a recognized etiology for persistent, often progressive, lateral hip pain, weakness, and limp. Multiple repair techniques and salvage procedures for abductor tendon tears have been reported in the literature; however, re-tear remains a frequent complication following surgical repair. This study compares the short-term outcomes of open abductor tendon repairs with decortication and suture fixation (DSF) compared to a modified technique repair into a bone trough (BT), to determine best surgical results for large abductor tendon avulsions. Additionally, surgical treatment of small tears versus large tears was examined.
Methods
The outcomes of 37 consecutive hip abductor tendon repairs treated between January 2009 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Large tears were defined as detachment of 33–100% of the gluteus medius insertion. There were 15 DSF and 10 BT cases. Postoperative pain, ability to perform single leg stance, hip abduction, and Trendelenburg lurch, were examined. Small tears (12 cases) were defined as having no gluteus medius avulsion from the trochanteric insertion and were comprised of longitudinal tears (repaired side-by-side) and isolated gluteus minimus tears (repaired by tenodesis to the overlying gluteus medius). Standard statistical analyses were utilized. Type I error for all analyses was set at α=0.05.
Results
When comparing large tear repair outcomes, repairs into a BT had superior outcomes to repairs with DSF: 0 (BT) versus 6 (DSF, 40%) failure rate (p<0.05), and greater reductions in pain at one-year post surgery (Δ VAS: BT, −5.70±0.97 | DSF: −2.73±0.69; p<0.01), ability to perform a single leg stance and hip abduction (90% and 100% vs 47% and 73%) (p<0.05). Clinical strength ratings were higher for repairs into a BT, but this did not reach statistical significance. When comparing large to small tear repair outcomes, small tears were found to have lower VAS pain scores and higher clinical strength ratings during both the pre-op and 1-year post-op time points (p<0.05). A higher percentage of those with small tears were able to perform a single leg stance and hip abduction (100%) compared to those with large tears (64% and 78% respectively) (p<0.05). A significantly higher frequency of residual lurch was also observed for those with large tears; 56% compared to small tears at 0%.
Conclusions
Utilizing a BT repair significantly improved surgical results for large abductor tendon avulsions.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic level IV case series
