header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Hip

DOES PATIENT-REPORTED PAIN DIFFER BASED ON SURGICAL APPROACH IN TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY?

The Hip Society (THS) 2018 Summer Meeting, New York, NY, USA, October 2018.



Abstract

Introduction

Despite well-fixed implants, persistent pain following total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains a concern. Various surgical approaches have been advocated, yet whether patient-reported pain differs amongst techniques has not been investigated. This study's purposes were to determine differences in patient-reported pain based on surgical approach (direct anterior –DA versus posterolateral-PL) or PL approach incision length. Our hypothesis was that no differences in patient-reported pain would be present.

Methods

A retrospective, IRB-approved investigation from 2 centers was performed. 7 fellowship trained arthroplasty surgeons (3 DA, 3 PL, 1 both) enrolled patients undergoing primary THA for non-inflammatory arthritis. PL approach patients were categorized based on incision length (6–8cm, 8–12cm, 12–15cm). Exclusion criteria were a prior hip surgery, revision procedure, or limited postoperative mobility. All THAs were performed using a cementless titanium, proximally coated, tapered femoral stem and hemispherical acetabular component. All patients had a minimum of 1-year clinical follow-up with radiographically well-fixed components.

A pain-drawing questionnaire was administered in which patients identify the location and intensity of pain on an anatomic diagram. Independent Student's t-tests and Chi-square analyses were performed (p<0.05 = significant). Power analysis indicated 800 patients in each cohort would provide adequate power to detect a 4% difference in patient-reported pain (alpha = 0.05, beta = 0.80).

Results

1848 Patients (982 DA, 866 PL) were included. PL patients were younger (59.4 + 12.9 vs. 62.7 + 9.7; p<0.001) and had shorter follow-up (3.3 + 1.3 vs. 3.7 + 1.3 years; p<0.001) versus DA patients. There was no difference in postoperative UCLA score (6.0 + 1.9 vs. 6.0 + 2.0; p>0.9).

PL patients reported increased moderate to severe trochanteric (21% vs. 14%; p<0.001) and groin pain (24% vs. 19%; p=0.004) than DA patients. There were no differences in anterior or lateral thigh, posterior thigh, low back, or buttock pain between the two cohorts (p=0.05–0.7). PL approach incision length did not impact the incidence or severity of patient-reported pain (p=0.3–0.7).

Conclusion

When specifically queried, a significant proportion of patients experience persistent pain following THA via either a PL or DA approach. PL patients reported greater trochanteric and groin pain, although PL incision length did not impact the incidence or severity of patient-reported pain.

Summary Statement

A significant proportion of patient experience persistent pain following THA, with an increased reporting of trochanteric and groin pain in those receiving a posterolateral versus anterior approach.