Abstract
Background
The modern modular implants allow surgeons to combine different combinations of components within the same brand of which some may have completely different design.
During 1999–2012 the same cemented femur component was used together with a cemented stemmed tibia baseplate and also against a cemented pegged tibia baseplate. We decided to compare the revision rate of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) using these two tibia baseplates.
Methods
This is a register study. During 1999–2012, 32,429 cemented, CR TKA's of a specific brand were reported to the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register (SKAR). The part numbers for the femur, tibia and insert (in modular implants) were available in 99.2% of cases. The most common combination used the cemented CR femur against a cemented stemmed baseplate in 50.3% of cases while the same CR femur was used against a cemented pegged baseplate in 8.3% of cases, mainly at two hospitals. In order to make the material more comparable, only patients having osteoarthritis (OA) were included and only TKAs using two types of regular constraint inserts and in which the patella had been left un-resurfaced. Chi-Square test was used to investigate gender distribution in the groups and t-test for the mean age at surgery. Kaplan Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to evaluate the risk of revision until the end of 2016. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
After exclusions, there were 15,287 knees with the stemmed and 2,479 with the pegged tibia baseplate. The mean follow-up time was 8.1 years (range 0–18). The proportion of women in the stemmed group was 59% and 60% in the pegged group (p=0.32) and the mean age at surgery for the groups was 69.9 years and 70.0 years, respectively (p=0.41). The cumulative revision rate (CRR) at 15 years for TKAs using the stemmed baseplate was 3.0% (95% CI: 2.6–3.5) as compared to 5.8% (95% CI: 4.0–8.3) for the pegged baseplate (p=0.003). When only revisions for loosening were considered, the CRR was respectively 0.6% (95% CI: 0.4–0. 9) and 3. 8% (95% CI: 2.3–6.3) (p<0.001).
Conclusion
We found that TKAs using the pegged base plate had significantly higher risk for revision, both for all reasons as well as for only loosening. As the pegged baseplate surgeries were performed mostly at only two hospitals it is possible that local factors are to blame. However, considering that after stopping using the pegged baseplate, the two hospitals performed least as well as other hospitals using the same brand we think it is likely that the pegged plate has a higher risk of loosening and that our observation warrants that the performance of pegged plates is investigated in other registers.
