Abstract
Prior implant designs have relied on a four-bar link theory and featured J-curve femoral components intended to recreate femoral rollback of the native knee, but this design could lead to anterior femoral sliding or paradoxical motion. Recent kinematic analyses of the native human knee have shown the medial compartment to be more stable to anteroposterior translation than the lateral, resulting in a “medial pivot” motion as the knee flexes. “Medial pivot” designs in total knee arthroplasty were introduced in the 1990s to attempt to re-create this motion. They consist of an asymmetric tibial insert with a highly congruent medial compartment and less conforming lateral compartment. The femoral component has a single radius of curvature and a high degree of conformity.
In vivo fluoroscopic studies have shown medial pivot designs to be successful in achieving its intended motion, while other cruciate-retaining designs had a higher incidence of paradoxical anterior translation and lateral condylar lift-off. Furthermore, numerous investigations have shown medial pivot designs to have excellent outcomes and survivorship at up to 10 years post-operatively. However, the contention in this debate that medial pivot designs avoid the need for ligament balancing is incorrect. Appropriate ligament balancing remains a crucial aspect of any successful total knee arthroplasty and is no less important based on the implant design utilised.
In the Methods section of all prior reports using a medial pivot design, the authors have noted that appropriate ligament balancing was obtained both in flexion and extension consistent with the recommended technique with other primary TKA implant designs. From a kinematic standpoint, this makes absolute sense. If a patient has a valgus imbalance with loose medial structures, then as the knee is brought into flexion the femur will not maintain congruency and contact with the conforming tibial surface – thus the medial pivot motion will be lost. Thus, balancing remains critical.
Lastly, although not the focal point of this debate, whether re-creation of a medial pivot motion in total knee arthroplasty actually improves patient outcomes remains an area of debate. A recent investigation by Warth and Meneghini, et al. demonstrated that re-creation of a medial-pivot pattern intra-operatively did not correlate with patient-reported outcomes at 1-year post-operatively. Thus, although the concept of a medial pivot design has merit, whether this will consistently improve outcomes and patient satisfaction remains to be seen.
