Abstract
Despite the demonstrated success in revision total joint arthroplasties, the utilization of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in primary total joint arthroplasty remains controversial. Multiple studies have demonstrated several risks associated with the routine use of this technique including: allergic reactions, changing the mechanical properties of the cement, emergence of resistant bacterial strains, systemic toxicity, and the added cost. In addition, evidence shows a currently low rate of periprosthetic joint infections in primary total joint arthroplasty (around 1%) and the theoretical benefit of marginally reducing this rate by using antibiotic-cement may not necessarily justify the associated risks and the added cost. Moreover, most of the primary total hip and an increasing number of primary total knee arthroplasties are cementless, which further raises questions about the routine use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in primary total joint arthroplasty.
