header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Hip

BIOLOGICAL BEHAVIOUR OF BONE IMPLANT INTERFACE IN CEMENTLESS TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY PROSPECTIVE MONITORING USING BIOMARKERS

The International Hip Society (IHS), London, England, September 2017



Abstract

There are numerous studies in the current literature that have demonstrated altered levels of various biomarkers in the serum of patients with implant loosening. Despite increasing interest in the biology of implant incorporation there are no studies investigating the changes in biological marker (of either osteoblastic or osteoclastic activity) levels during the integration of the bone-implant interface. Such a study would provide data about the biological profile of normal integration and would be helpful for future monitoring of implant prosthetic performance (either normal or abnormal).

We present data from a study performed on 100 osteoarthritic patients, who underwent cementless THA (Synergy, Reflexion Interfit, Smith & Nephew) and 100 non arthritic volunteers. Serial measurements of serum biochemical markers (bone formation and resorption), of cytokines and of other biological mediators and growth factors were evaluated at regular intervals over the course of six years. Curves of per cent changes from baseline and marker variability curves have been created for each marker which are indicative of the incorporation process.

Evaluating markers of osteoblastic activity, a first response, with average values below baseline, was observed at the level of the seventh day (perhaps as a response to local trauma). A second osteo-productive response was observed between the third week and 9 months (peak average values at the level of the 6th month). At the 1st year time interval, average values reached baseline and remained at this level up to the 6th postoperative year. Evaluating markers of osteoclastic activity, a first response, with average values above baseline, was observed at the level of the seventh day (perhaps as a response to local trauma). A second osteoclastic response was observed between the third week and 3 months (perhaps a coupling response to enhanced osteoblastic activity). At 6 months, average values reached baseline and remained at this level up to the 6th postoperative year.

It seems that bone implant interface in cementless total hip arthroplasty remains active up to the 9th postoperative month. Possible future deviation from such ‘individual normal’ curves will be indicative of the initiation of the osteolysis process and loss of fixation.


Email: