header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

METAGENOMIC SEQUENCING FOR ORTHOPAEDIC DEVICE-RELATED INFECTION

European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), Nantes, France, September 2017



Abstract

Aim

Culture of multiple periprosthetic tissue samples is the current gold-standard for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections (PJI). Additional diagnostic information may be obtained through sonication fluid culture of explants. These current techniques can have relatively low sensitivity, with prior antimicrobial therapy or infection by fastidious organisms particularly influencing culture results. Metagenomic sequencing has demonstrated potential as a tool for diagnosis of bacterial, viral and parasitic infections directly from clinical samples, without the need for an initial culture step. We assessed whether metagenomic sequencing of DNA extracts from sonication fluid can provide a sensitive tool for diagnosis of PJI compared to sonication fluid culture.

Method

We compared metagenomic sequencing with standard aerobic and anaerobic culture in 97 sonication fluid samples from prosthetic joint and other orthopaedic device-related infections. Sonication fluids were filtered to remove whole human cells and tissue debris, then bacterial cells were mechanically lysed before DNA extraction. DNA was sequenced and sequencing reads were taxonomically classified using Kraken. Using 50 derivation samples, we determined optimal thresholds for the number and proportion of bacterial reads required to identify an infection and confirmed our findings in 47 independent validation samples.

Results

A total of 131 sonication fluids were aerobically and anaerobically cultured and underwent metagenomic sequencing. From the first 72 sonication fluid samples sequenced 22 samples from six batches were excluded, as these samples and negative controls from the same batches showed similar contamination. The remaining 50 samples, the derivation set, were used to determine optimal sequence thresholds for identifying true infection. Of 59 subsequently sequenced validation samples, 12 from a single batch were excluded as the negative control was contaminated with Propionibacterium acnes, leaving 47 validation samples.

Compared to sonication fluid culture, the species-level sensitivity of metagenomic sequencing was 61/69(88%,95%CI 77–94%)(derivation samples 35/38[92%,79–98%]; validation samples 26/31[84%,66–95%]), and genus-level sensitivity was 64/69(93%,84–98%). Species-level specificity, adjusting for plausible fastidious causes of infection, species found in concurrently obtained tissue samples, and prior antibiotics, was 85/97(88%,79–93%)(derivation 43/50[86%,73–94%], validation 42/47[89%,77–96%]). High levels of human DNA contamination were seen despite use of laboratory methods to remove it.

Conclusions

We demonstrate as a proof of principle that metagenomic sequencing can provide accurate diagnostic information in PJI. Further depletion of human DNA will lead to improved genomic information on the cause of infection, strengthening the case for metagenomic sequencing as a diagnostic tool in PJI.


E-mail: