header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

ONE-STAGE EXCHANGE PROCEDURE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF INFECTED SHOULDER PROSTHESIS: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 16 CASES

European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), Nantes, France, September 2017



Abstract

Aim

Shoulder prosthesis chronic infection is a rare but serious complication, likely to lead to re-interventions and poor functional outcome. Two-stage exchange surgery is considered the standard procedure by most authors.

Our hypothesis was that one-stage revision procedure is a valid therapeutic option in the management of chronic infections of shoulder arthroplasty.

Method

This was a mono-center retrospective cohort study. All patients who underwent, during the inclusion period, a one-stage revision procedure for a chronic infection of shoulder arthroplasty were included. All patients underwent clinical evaluation (Constant-Murray score), radiological examination (standard X-rays) and a blood test (Complete Blood Count and C-reactive protein), at a minimal one-year follow-up. Primary endpoint of this study was the infectious outcome and secondary endpoints were the functional and radiographic outcomes.

Results

16 shoulder prosthesis in 14 patients (5 females, 9 males) were included. Mean time between primary prosthesis implantation and exchange surgery was 40 months (1–145). Mean follow up was 30,5 months. The principal micro-organism involved was Propionibacterium acnes (9/16) and multiple organisms were found in 6 patients. In 14/16 (87,5%) shoulders, we found no sign of persistent infection at last follow-up. 2/16 (12,5%) shoulders were considered as still infected. On these 2 patients still infected, one refused further revision and the other was not in a good enough medical condition to undergo another procedure. 2 patients required an additional one-stage procedure for a new infection (new pathogen) after a period of two years, both free of infection at last follow-up. At last follow-up, mean Constant score was 54,8 (23–82). 7/14 (50%) patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the global fonctionnal result.

Conclusions

One-stage revision procedure seems to be a valid therapeutic option in the management of infected shoulder prosthesis, as it allowed us to eradicate the infection in 87,5% patients in our serie, with a fair clinical result.


E-mail: