Abstract
Diabetes is a poor prognostic indicator after an acute ankle fracture. Many surgeons avoid essential surgery due to their concerns regarding complications.
We performed a retrospective analysis of complication rates for acute ankle fractures in diabetics with a control non-diabetic patient treated by all surgeons in our unit and assessed factors for success including long-segment fixation methodologies.
Patient records were cross-referenced with departmental databases and a retrospective review of all ankle fractures managed in our department was conducted from 2014. All patients subjected to a retrospective review of their notes and assessment of their follow up for at least 6 months. Radiographs were assessed of the ankle before and at completion of treatment were reviewed independently (RA and FR).
We identified all patients with a diabetic ankle fracture their HB1Ac (for diabetic control) and systematic co-morbidities. Fractures were classified into unimalleolar, bi malleolar and trimalleolar and surgery grouped into standard or long-segment-rigid fixation. Statistical analysis was conducted using absolute/relative risk (RR); numbers needed to treat (NNT) were calculated. We compared a control-group, a diabetic group managed conservatively, and undergoing surgery; comparing the concept of rigid fixation. Further sub-analysis conducted to assess differences between diabetic neuropathy, retinopathy and nephropathy. Ethics approval was granted as per our institutional policy by our governance lead.
We identified 64 patients with a diabetic ankle fractures, their fracture pattern and a control group. Thirty-one had conservative treatment; 33 had operative fixation of which 13 had rigid fixation. Compared to the control (n=32) both diabetic groups had a higher risk of possible complication. The relative risk was between 3.1–3.4 (P<0.002) and linked to systematic complications of diabetes e.g. neuropathy 5.9 (P<0.003); HBA1c 4.6 P<0.004); and neuropathy and retinopathy 6.2 P<0.0003). We observed RR is reduced for a complication occurring following surgery with prolonged immobilization (0.86) and rigid fixation (0.65) and NNT required to see a benefit from rigid fixation was 7. The overall RR for a complication was similar between conservative and surgical management (4.6 vs.5.1).
We agree diabetics have a higher risk for complications than non-diabetics, however the risk is not as great as previously reported. There is little difference in surgical or conservative treatment but strong evidence indicating rigid long-segment-fixation with prolonged-immobilization could improve the risk benefit ratio when compared to non- operative management alone but further evaluation is required.
