header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

NECK OF FEMUR PATIENTS ON WARFARIN: HOW TO OPTIMISE THEM AND ACHIEVE THE BEST PRACTICE TARIFF?

British Indian Orthopaedic Society (BIOS) (previously IOSUK) Annual Scientific Meeting, July 2017



Abstract

Introduction

Management of a patient with a neck of femur (NOF) fracture is a key aspect of orthopaedic trauma care, with around 75 000 new cases in the United Kingdom annually costing the health care over £ 2 billion. Delaying time to theatre for operative intervention of hip fractures negatively impacts on patient outcome and is one of the key aspects of the hip fracture best practice tariff (BPT). One aspect of the peri-operative management of patients with hip fractures implicated in delayed surgery is the use of long term warfarin for anticoagulation. Anticoagulation reversal is a common cause of operative delay.

Aim

The aim was to establish the impact this cohort of population had on achieving the BPT and how we could improve it.

Material and Methods

Retrospective data was collected over a period of 12 months using the national hip fracture data base (NHFD). The delay to theatre specifically those who were on warfarin was identified. 10 % of the identified cohort was delayed to theatre due to high international normalised ratio (>1.5) and failed to achieve BPT. This cost the trust a loss of around £ 43,200. We have now introduced a simple hand-held warfarin testing device in accident and emergency. All patients on warfarin from history will have a pin prick and instantaneous INR estimated while the routine bloods are dispatched to the laboratory. If INR > 1.5 a stat 2mg intra venous Vit K (IVK) is initiated and INR rechecked at 6 hrs and if indicated further IVK is administered. The device costs £ 800 which is one off investment. Each patient will cost £ 6 for the strips and controls. This will avoid potential huge revenue loss and aid better medical practice.

Conclusion

By the use of this simple device and its introduction in the A and E department, we can avoid the time lost for the anticoagulation reversal. This will mean improved patient care and compliance with BPT can be achieved in this cohort of NOF fracture patients.


Email: