143 – THE MECHANICAL EFFECT OF LOCKING AND BLOCKING SCREWS IN DISTAL FEMUR FRACTURES

Abstract

Purpose: Blocking screws placed adjacent to intramedullary nails supplement fixation in long bone fractures with a short proximal or distal segment. Clinically, blocking screws are placed using fluoroscopy, resulting in variability in screw placement. The clinical significance of the accuracy of screw placement is unknown. Recently, a targeted blocking screw device was developed, enabling precise placement of screws adjacent to the nail. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanical effects of locking screws (LS) and targeted (TBS) and non-targeted blocking screws (NBS) in distal femur fractures.

Method: Sawbone^® femurs were used to create a fracture model. Femoral sawbone specimens were osteotomized eight cm proximal to the knee joint and a two cm gap was created. Intramedullary nails were used for stabilization, including one proximal locking screw and varying the distal screw configuration for study purposes. Targeted blocking screws were inserted directly adjacent to the intramedullary device using the commercially-available targeting device. Non-targeted screws were inserted one screw diameter medial or lateral to the “ideal” position. Four study groups were created; group one consisted of TBS and two distal LS. Group two had TBS and one LS. Group three had NBS and two LS, and group four consisted of NBS and one LS. Specimens were subjected to a cyclic compression protocol along the mechanical axis of the femur. Applied load varied from 100 to 700 N in 100 N incremental staircase loading protocol. Load-displacement curves recorded construct stiffness. Fracture gap motion was measured with electronic calipers.

Results: Targeted constructs were stiffer at all load levels, and 10% stiffer overall. Differences were statistically significant at moderate load levels (Group one vs three, 400N and 500N, p< 0.05).

Conclusion: Targeted constructs were stiffer at all load levels despite Sawbones^® undergoing significant deformation at the proximal femur, masking the relatively smaller differences in motion at the fracture site. A difference in sagittal motion was found between groups with one and two LS, independent of the position of blocking screws. In conclusion, targeted blocking screw constructs were stiffer at all load levels compared to non-targeted constructs. The number of LS was a factor in sagittal plane stability. This study suggests that using targeted blocking screws in distal femur fractures may reduce fracture motion and decrease post operative malalignment.