header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

318. USEFULNESS OF PERCUTANEOUS INJECTION OF CONCENTRATED AUTOLOGOUS BONE MARROW FOR THE TREATMENT OF LONG BONE NONUNION



Abstract

Purpose of the study: Nonunion, which is a biological failure, requires revision, usually an aggressive operation. Haematopoietic bone marrow contains colony forming unit fibroblasts (CFU-F) which could favour bone healing. The purpose of this work was to determine whether a minimally invasive procedure, injection of CFU-F into the nonunion space, could favour bone healing without further procedure.

Material and methods: Our series included 43 patients: 36 male and 7 female, mean age 39.9 years. Forty-seven atrophic and aseptic nonunions of long bones were treated with percutaneous injection of concentrated autologous bone marrow: 27 tibias, 17 femurs, 3 humeri. Bone marrow was harvested from the posterior iliac crests (346 ml) then centrifuged to keep the leuko-platelet fraction (78 ml). This concentrate was injection into the nonunion space under radioscopic guidance. Efficacy was assessed on the basis of clinical criteria (complete pain-free weight-bearing, absence of contention, absence of mobility) and on radiographic criteria (healing of 3/4 corticals).

Results: Thirty nonunions healed: 19 tibias (70%, 11 femurs (65%) and 0 humerus. Mean time to healing was 5.9 months (2.4–15.6). Factors of poor prognosis were: smoking, alcohol, diabetes, corticosteroids, radiotherapy, history of sepsis (p=0.01). Early grafting increased the chances of success (p=0.04). Age, initial skin opening, type of fixation did not have a significant impact on healing. The number of CFU-F had an effect on the rate of healing.

Discussion: This technique is effective for the treatment of nonunion of the lower limb, allowing bone healing in two thirds of the cases with a minimally aggressive procedure. The method is easy to perform but requires a rigorous technique for the different phases of puncture, concentration and reinjection. Nonunions unresponsive to conventional methods, and thus corresponding to multifactorial problems, probably constitute the limitation of this method. Cell expansion or differentiation techniques could be helpful in improving the success rate but at the present time the osteogenic potential of these cells remains to be elucidated as a function of their stage of maturation.

Conclusion: Percutaneous grafts of concentrated autologous bone marrow can be a useful contribution to the therapeutic armamentarium for nonunion. Morbidity is low and the method does not compromise future options. It can be proposed as a first-intention solution for the treatment of long bone nonunion.

Correspondence should be addressed to Ghislaine Patte at sofcot@sofcot.fr