header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

303. REVISION TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY USING A NON-CEMENTED MODULAR STEM (PP): CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC OUTCOME AT MEAN NINE YEARS FOLLOW-UP



Abstract

Purpose of the study: We report the clinical and radiographic results of a series of revision total hip arthroplasties performed for aseptic loosening using a non-demented modular femoral implant (PP).

Material and methods: From 1991 to 2003, 146 revisions of total hip arthroplasty were performed using the same non-cemented modular femoral implant (PP). At mean nine years follow-up (3.5–17 years), 24 patients had died, 26 had insufficient data for review and 39 were lost to follow-up. The analysis thus included 54 cases. All revisions were performed for aseptic loosening. Mean age at surgery was 60 years. Preoperative bone damage, according to the Sofcot classification, was grade I and II (69%), grade III (26%), grade IV (5.5%). Clinical outcome was assessed with the Harris and Postel-Merle-d’Aubigné scores. The radiological review analysed stem anchoring, lucency and periprosthetic reconstruction.

Results: At mean nine years follow-up, the mean Harris score was 71 points, the mean PMA score 12.8 points. Patient satisfaction was 70%. There were five cases with deep infection (9%), five with dislocation and six intra-operative periprosthetic fractures. Trochanterotomy non-union was noted in 26% of patients. Mean impaction of the femoral stem was 5 mm (range 0–16 mm). There was a statistically significant association between the degree of bone damage and the quality of the bone reconstruction (p=0.012). Mean increase in cortical thickness in zones 1 and 2 (Gruen) was 1.1 mm and 1.6 mm respectively. In Gruen zones 2 and 6, the gain was 6 and 10 mm respectively. There were nine surgical revisions (17%) for deep infection (n=4), recurrent aseptic loosening and fracture of the femoral implant (n=1). The ten-year survival taking aseptic loosening as the endpoint was 90%.0

Discussion and Conclusion: Our work showed the good long-term results obtained with this implant for revision total hip arthroplasty. It allows clinical improvement, periprosthetic bone reconstruction and a low rate of surgical revision.

Correspondence should be addressed to Ghislaine Patte at sofcot@sofcot.fr