header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

22. LARGE OR MASSIVE ROTATOR CUFF TEARS BEFORE 65 YEARS: WHAT CAN BE DONE WHEN ANATOMIC REPAIR IS IMPOSSIBLE?



Abstract

Purpose of the study: For patients aged less than 65 years who have a large rotator cuff tear, potential solutions include anatomic repair, palliative treatment, non-anatomic repair with flaps or cuff prosthesis, and reversed prosthesis. The later solution is not recommended at this age and anatomic repair is not always possible. In this situation, what is best, palliative treatment or flap or prosthesis repair?

Material and method: This retrospective multicentric study included 142 patients, 74 men and 68 women with a large or massive cuff tear. Palliative treatment (group A) involved acromioplasty (n=48) associated as needed with a biceps procedure and partial repair (n=41). Non-anatomic repair (group B) included supra-spinatous translation (n=16), deltoid flaps (n=22), and cuff prostheses (n=15). Preoperatively, the two groups were not statistically different for acromiohumeral height (AH, 6 mm in group A versus 7.5 mm in group B) and percent of fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus > II (55% in group A versus 26% in group B). The Constant score, active and passive range of motion, gain in elevation and external rotation were noted.

Results: Mean follow-up was 74 months in group A and 90 months in group B; the Constant score was 64 and 65, active elevation 145 and 147 and external rotation 17 and 26 respectively. The two groups were not significantly different. For patients with deficient elevation (n=46), the gain was 62 without any difference between the two groups. For patients with deficient external rotation (n=37), the gain was nil in both groups.

Discussion: Although group A had a more severe condition than group B (narrower AH and more advanced fatty degeneration, the final outcome as assessed by the Constant score and range of motion was similar. Both groups recovered active elevation well, but not external rotation. Nevertheless, there were no cases of latissimus dorsi transfer in this series. Repair with a deltoid flap, supraspinatus translation, or cuff prosthesis does not appear to add any supplementary benefit despite the more aggressive surgery.

Correspondence should be addressed to Ghislaine Patte at sofcot@sofcot.fr